Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v662eq$2najh$9@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: OT: EV Charging Stations Stripped of Copper Cables
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 12:52:58 +0100
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <v662eq$2najh$9@dont-email.me>
References: <v64kvk$2cc3j$2@dont-email.me> <v65m9e$2mc0i$1@dont-email.me>
 <len6voFfsavU2@mid.individual.net> <v65rnf$2najh$3@dont-email.me>
 <v65vvh$2o5s9$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 13:52:58 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dc51d958de16694e953d6628ba38a631";
	logging-data="2861681"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+4B/zZeI4LPzsVY3tcR39LXQVcuvsbKuY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FjPAWmNaoWHzAO8LsH2+TypAo5M=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <v65vvh$2o5s9$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3270

On 04/07/2024 12:10, RJH wrote:
> On 4 Jul 2024 at 10:58:07 BST, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> 
>> On 04/07/2024 10:06, alan_m wrote:
>>> Another half truth by the industry. It's only cheaper when it works and
>>> if you ignore the backup required for when it doesn't and the extra
>>> infrastructure costs required to distribute it.
>>
>> It isn't even cheaper then.
>> Some of us have run the numbers...
>>
> 
> Care to share ;-)
> 
>> Per gigawatt a wind turbine is cheaper than a nuclear power station but
>> that ignores
>> - the shorter lifetime of the windmill
>> - the capacity factor of the windmill
>> - the massive maintenance cost associated with a windmill.
>>
> 
> I find it hard to believe that the revenue costs (per unit of electricity) of
> a wind turbine exceeds those of nuclear.

Its not open to belief. Its open to FACT

But you need to have some understanding of finance and accounting.

If you can borrow money at 5% because there is a 'green' fund, and your 
income is GUARANTEED by government, you are at a considerable advantage 
over a nuclear company who has to borrow at market rates, and with a 
possible premium because the risk of nuclear being stopped by the next 
government is very real as happened in Germany where Vattenfall EON and 
RWE successfully sued the german government for billions for breach of 
contract...

...then naturally the costs will be far higher.
But if you remove all the tax breaks, cheap debt, and subsidies  ROCS 
and carbon credits from renewables and compare them on a levelised 
lifetime basis,  then wind is 2-3 times more expensive than nuclear and 
solar about 5 times.

Just on the basis of the wind and solar farms themselves, not including 
costs that they don't bear, like battery backup grid extensions long DC 
interconnectors  decommissioning and gas backup


-- 
When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men in a society, over 
the course of time they create for themselves a legal system that 
authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it.

  Frédéric Bastiat