Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v665t0$2oun1$10@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: People are still trying to get away with disagreeing with the semantics of the x86 language Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 07:51:44 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 25 Message-ID: <v665t0$2oun1$10@dont-email.me> References: <v5pbjf$55h$1@dont-email.me> <v5r5q9$ekvf$1@dont-email.me> <v5s40h$jvgt$1@dont-email.me> <v5sbpt$1kfbr$2@i2pn2.org> <v5sjsa$msl0$1@dont-email.me> <v5skc9$1kfbr$7@i2pn2.org> <v5smuk$n7a2$1@dont-email.me> <v5sorr$1kfbr$10@i2pn2.org> <v5sp4v$nnko$1@dont-email.me> <v5sr4t$1kfbq$1@i2pn2.org> <v5srjn$o1o0$1@dont-email.me> <v5ssaq$1kfbq$2@i2pn2.org> <v5st66$o7ss$1@dont-email.me> <c932a0dabd6ef1285bc553269e2d61b7d9eabc2b@i2pn2.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 14:51:44 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8ec8ab09a9c087279b96ae2505557d8c"; logging-data="2915041"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18SBpAXDQt7P0pb3zDdGP/f" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:NlrnlynwR18o+5kXTyTehzqmSUA= In-Reply-To: <c932a0dabd6ef1285bc553269e2d61b7d9eabc2b@i2pn2.org> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2401 On 7/4/2024 6:05 AM, joes wrote: > Am Sun, 30 Jun 2024 19:27:50 -0500 schrieb olcott: >> On 6/30/2024 7:13 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>> On 6/30/24 8:00 PM, olcott wrote: >>>> >>>> THIS SEQUENCE CANNOT POSSIBLY RETURN WHY PERSISTENTLY LIE ABOUT IT? >>>> >>> But it does, just after H gives up its simulation. >>> You have even show that with a simulation. > >> DDD correctly emulated by HHH calls an emulated HHH(DDD) >> that emulates its own DDD that calls an emulated HHH(DDD) >> that is either aborted at some point never returning or hits >> out-of-memory error never returning > Running out of memory is only a physical constraint of no concern > to the theoretical behaviour. > None-the-less it makes it totally clear that DDD correctly simulated by HHH DOES NOT HALT. -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer