Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v66bcq$2plrr$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Ben fails to understand Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 09:25:29 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 136 Message-ID: <v66bcq$2plrr$1@dont-email.me> References: <tic5tr$25uem$6@dont-email.me> <8735bpq5jh.fsf@bsb.me.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 16:25:30 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8ec8ab09a9c087279b96ae2505557d8c"; logging-data="2938747"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19BQCl1Uazdpe99vtCx0u3a" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:BBXdut+SAprtnUiQm1WPEVfvlgE= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <8735bpq5jh.fsf@bsb.me.uk> Bytes: 6656 On 10/14/2022 7:44 PM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: > Python <python@invalid.org> writes: > > Olcott (annotated): > >> If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D until H >> correctly determines that its simulated D would never stop running >> >> [comment: as D halts, the simulation is faulty, Pr. Sipser has been >> fooled by Olcott shell game confusion "pretending to simulate" and >> "correctly simulate"] >> >> unless aborted then H can abort its simulation of D and correctly >> report that D specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations. > > I don't think that is the shell game. PO really /has/ an H (it's > trivial to do for this one case) that correctly determines that P(P) > *would* never stop running *unless* aborted. He knows and accepts that > P(P) actually does stop. The wrong answer is justified by what would > happen if H (and hence a different P) where not what they actually are. > <MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022> If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D until H correctly determines that its simulated D would never stop running unless aborted then H can abort its simulation of D and correctly report that D specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations. </MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022> It is the case that H must abort its simulation of P to prevent its own non-termination. The directly executed P(P) benefits from H already having aborted its simulation of P. P correctly simulated H cannot reap this benefit proving that it is a different sequence of configurations than the directly executed P(P). > (I've gone back to his previous names what P is Linz's H^.) > >> In other words: "if the simulation were right the answer would be >> right". > > I don't think that's the right paraphrase. He is saying if P were > different (built from a non-aborting H) H's answer would be the right > one. > >> But the simulation is not right. D actually halts. > > But H determines (correctly) that D would not halt if it were not > halted. That much is a truism. Thus H(D,D) must abort the simulation of its input to prevent its own non-termination. > What's wrong is to pronounce that > answer as being correct for the D that does, in fact, stop. > That is a different D that is being simulated in a different memory process. The executed D(D) only halts because D correctly simulated by H was aborted. They are not the same instance of D. void DDD() { HHH(DDD); // creates new process context } // thus not the same DDD as the // one that is directly executed. int main() { DDD(DDD); } _DDD() [00002163] 55 push ebp [00002164] 8bec mov ebp,esp [00002166] 6863210000 push 00002163 [0000216b] e853f4ffff call 000015c3 [00002170] 83c404 add esp,+04 [00002173] 5d pop ebp [00002174] c3 ret Size in bytes:(0018) [00002174] _main() [00002183] 55 push ebp [00002184] 8bec mov ebp,esp [00002186] 6863210000 push 00002163 ; push DDD [0000218b] e8d3ffffff call 00002163 ; call DDD(DDD) [00002190] 83c404 add esp,+04 [00002193] 33c0 xor eax,eax [00002195] 5d pop ebp [00002196] c3 ret Size in bytes:(0020) [00002196] machine stack stack machine assembly address address data code language ======== ======== ======== ========= ============= [00002183][001037dd][00000000] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping [00002184][001037dd][00000000] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping [00002186][001037d9][00002163] 6863210000 push 00002163 ; push DDD [0000218b][001037d5][00002190] e8d3ffffff call 00002163 ; call HHH(DDD) [00002163][001037d1][001037dd] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping [00002164][001037d1][001037dd] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping [00002166][001037cd][00002163] 6863210000 push 00002163 ; push DDD [0000216b][001037c9][00002170] e853f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DDD) New slave_stack at:103881 ; Create new process context Begin Local Halt Decider Simulation Execution Trace Stored at:113889 [00002163][00113879][0011387d] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping [00002164][00113879][0011387d] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping [00002166][00113875][00002163] 6863210000 push 00002163 ; push DDD [0000216b][00113871][00002170] e853f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DDD) New slave_stack at:14e2a9 ; Create new process context [00002163][0015e2a1][0015e2a5] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping [00002164][0015e2a1][0015e2a5] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping [00002166][0015e29d][00002163] 6863210000 push 00002163 ; push DDD [0000216b][0015e299][00002170] e853f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DDD) Local Halt Decider: Infinite Recursion Detected Simulation Stopped [00002170][001037d1][001037dd] 83c404 add esp,+04; executed DDD(DDD) [00002173][001037d5][00002190] 5d pop ebp ; executed DDD(DDD) [00002174][001037d9][00002163] c3 ret ; executed DDD(DDD) [00002190][001037dd][00000000] 83c404 add esp,+04 [00002193][001037dd][00000000] 33c0 xor eax,eax [00002195][001037e1][00000018] 5d pop ebp [00002196][001037e5][00000000] c3 ret Number of Instructions Executed(10073) == 150 Pages -- Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer