Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 17:27:39 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 79
Message-ID: <v66f1c$2qd2s$2@dont-email.me>
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2024 17:27:43 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="296b2ac96a123783d826a4b3e4034cfe";
	logging-data="2962524"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/6D3c04IOVfxnGLMGrxGAN"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:szBb0RCU9qhZW47k8Nc8JJA2URc=
In-Reply-To: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4591

Le 04/07/2024 à 15:30, Richard Hachel a écrit :
> Langevin's paradox.
> The Langevin paradox is a very serious criticism against the theory of 
> relativity. Unfortunately, the canonization and divinization of Albert 
> Einstein as the new son of God on earth (it was excessive in both 
> substance and form) completely obscured the problem, and we only saw 
> dozens high-level theorists were right against him, and that their 
> grievances were audible.
> 
> What was the grievance?
> 
> If the twin of the stars returns younger in the frame of reference of 
> the twin who remained on earth, then the twin who remained on earth, if 
> we apply the reciprocity of effects, and Doctor Richard Hachel says that 
> we must use this notion of reciprocity, very basis of logic, comes back 
> older than the other. Which is both logical and absurd.
> 
> No one has ever been able to answer the question correctly and perfectly 
> (except Hachel), and if we look closely at the forums, articles, 
> websites, books, publications, for 120 years, not everyone has There's 
> nothing wrong with it, and everyone says anything to try to get back on 
> their feet.
> 
> Only Doctor Hachel (what a man!) gave the perfect explanation, as on 
> other points of the SR, because he uses appropriate and consistent 
> relativistic geometry, and he KNOWS how to explain things clearly.
> 
> The great problem facing the world's physicists is a problem of 
> confusion. They confuse two notions: the notion of relativity of 
> measured times, and the notion of reciprocal relativity of chronotropies.
> 
> It's not the same thing.
> 
> Hence the impossibility for them all to explain things coherently.
> 
> The relativity of the measured times will show that over a journey of 24 
> light years, carried out at v=0.8c, Terrence will age by 30 years.
> It's very simple: x=v.t, i.e. t=x/v and 24*0.8=30
> But when Stella returns, she will only be 18 years old.
> 
> There is therefore an asymmetry, that is obvious, but it is on the 
> explanation of the asymmetry that everyone sinks into complete ignorance.
> 
> Because we are confusing it with the notion of chronotropy, which is 
> ANOTHER THING, and which can be defined by the internal functioning of 
> watches. On this, yes, the effect is symmetrical, reciprocal; each 
> watch, and throughout the entire journey, (including if I place a small 
> half-turn phase on a semi-circle with a preserved tangential speed of 
> 0.8c), beats faster than the other watch, and the equation is constant 
> and reciprocal over the entire path: T2=T1/sqrt(1-v²/c²).
> 
> This is true.
> 
> But this only qualifies chronotropy, that is to say the internal 
> mechanism of watches, it is not the whole of the relativistic effect.
> 
> This is not what we will ultimately measure.
> 
> I can't explain it more clearly.
> 
> Now, if you are curious, and truly in love with science, you try to 
> understand what I am saying, without spitting, without mocking, and you 
> refer to the little diagrams posted years ago already, which explain the 
> things as we have never done before, notably with the logical notion of 
> the elasticity of relativistic distances.
> 
> All of perfect theoretical and experimental beauty.
> 
> “I have told you all these things, so that when the time comes, you will 
> remember that I said them.”
> 
> Jesus Christ knew that no one would believe him, and that Minerva's owl 
> would not take flight until nightfall.
> 
> R.H.

Same bullshit you've posted for decades. You are ill, Lengrand.