Article <v673ba$2tk7t$1@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano
<v673ba$2tk7t$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: Ernest Major <{$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Ancient tetrapod predator
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 22:14:19 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 58
Sender: news%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <v673ba$2tk7t$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v64hts$2c71d$3@dont-email.me>
 <E6-cnfv2qZWQShj7nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v64tu2$2ej0p$1@dont-email.me>
 <IqydnauvOc3ZMhv7nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <v66uf6$2t310$2@dont-email.me>
 <SumdnXusYqvYmxr7nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com>
Reply-To: {$to$}@meden.demon.co.uk
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="88534"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Cw3yDoK8W+XPDNyEQlD6+XkdvDs=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <SumdnXusYqvYmxr7nZ2dnZfqlJydnZ2d@giganews.com>
	FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
	smtp.eternal-september.org
Bytes: 5112

On 04/07/2024 21:29, John Harshman wrote:
> On 7/4/24 12:51 PM, RonO wrote:
>> On 7/4/2024 9:18 AM, John Harshman wrote:
>>> On 7/3/24 6:29 PM, RonO wrote:
>>>> On 7/3/2024 5:56 PM, John Harshman wrote:
>>>>> On 7/3/24 3:04 PM, RonO wrote:
>>>>>> https://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory/fossils-show-huge-salamanderlike-predator-sharp-fangs-existed-111645297
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The giant salamander with fangs may have lived 280 million years 
>>>>>> ago, and they claim that Namibia was in a much colder region of 
>>>>>> the world at that time (they claim glacial region).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Click on the link in the fourth paragraph and you can get a copy 
>>>>>> of the Nature article to read, otherwise the article is pay walled.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ron Okimoto
>>>>>>
>>>>> What do you mean by "they claim"? Are you trying to cast doubt on 
>>>>> the Permian glaciation? There's plenty of evidence for it.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why would you think that I was casting doubt on their claims.
>>>
>>> That's more or less what "they claim" connotes. Perhaps you misspoke?
>>
>> Perhaps you misunderstood.  They did make those claims in the paper.
>>
>>>
>>>> The paper indicates that if the region of Pangea that is now Namibia 
>>>> was as cold as they think, then amphibians had adapted to colder 
>>>> climates after diversification during the Caboniferous.
>>>
>>> "As cold as they think" is hardly a matter of "if". That part of 
>>> Gondwana was near the south pole at the time, and there's all sorts 
>>> of evidence of a protracted series of ice ages. There were of course 
>>> interglacials, but there would still have been very long, cold 
>>> winters. Think Alaska.
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Late_Paleozoic_icehouse
>>>
>>
>> You seem to want to misunderstand what I wrote.
>>
> 
> Don't really want to belabor the point, but "they claim" and "if...as 
> cold as they think" are just not appropriate for what are well-settled 
> scientific facts. If I said "They claim that whales are artiodactyls" or 
> "if the mid-Atlantic ridge is a spreading center as they think", what 
> would you make of that?
> 

I sometimes use "report" when I'm not in a position to endorse something 
out of my own knowledge or understanding. I hope this doesn't have the 
negative implications of the use of "claim" in this context.

-- 
alias Ernest Major