Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please>
Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y,sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: EV Charging Stations Stripped of Copper Cables
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 19:57:22 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <v69c1g$3cjui$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v64kvk$2cc3j$2@dont-email.me> <v655vt$2jju3$1@dont-email.me>
 <v65g26$2l5br$4@dont-email.me> <v65m9e$2mc0i$1@dont-email.me>
 <len6voFfsavU2@mid.individual.net> <v68n28$38o9t$3@dont-email.me>
 <v68ok5$39f6o$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 19:54:56 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="228697a5287d7727421faded79c1bfe0";
	logging-data="3559378"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Yokqa0d3eKbIGLGrfHRY6"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:fkIfahh2fsP+/GYC63hPiE/PU9A=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v68ok5$39f6o$3@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2237

On 7/5/24 14:23, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> On 05/07/2024 12:56, Andrew wrote:
> 
>> Sir 412 seats has already said he intends to put noses out of joint and
>> abolish the ability to use planning/objection delays to delay or
>> prevent important infrastructure developments.
>>
> Except when they are nuclear power of course.
> A quick look at who is advising the labour party on energy is enough to 
> make you weep.
> Greenpeace
> FoE
> Ember.
> Renewable UK
> 
> No sign of a single nuclear advocate being allowed within a 50 mile 
> exclusion zone around the Labour Party
> 

Greenpeace spoiled its reputation with me when I questioned one
of their acolytes about -what I believed was- an inaccuracy in
one of their arguments. His reply was that they knew full well
that their argument was inaccurate, but that lying was justified
if it advanced their cause.

Sorry, but no.

Jeroen Belleman