Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v69dpg$3cud2$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: RE: Re: Grease and waxes Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 13:24:49 -0500 Organization: Yellow Jersey, Ltd. Lines: 98 Message-ID: <v69dpg$3cud2$4@dont-email.me> References: <2sBgO.71834$J8n7.36771@fx12.iad> <v5vmqk$1b51j$1@dont-email.me> <Qd_gO.467$bhp2.431@fx15.iad> <v62fch$20usq$2@dont-email.me> <878qyi8jvq.fsf@mothra.home> <v64817$2amrm$2@dont-email.me> <87jzi2dw8e.fsf@mothra.home> <3oVhO.13795$%gXc.8687@fx14.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 20:24:49 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e32dc29ed37936f87dd1f813e8fe3d0c"; logging-data="3570082"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+rQD8sSmmvO8WK4jZlBjsO" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:3oCKKFVBDHO4hUQOaHnmcUCZvDA= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <3oVhO.13795$%gXc.8687@fx14.iad> Bytes: 5918 On 7/5/2024 11:42 AM, Tom Kunich wrote: > On Wed Jul 3 17:03:13 2024 Radey Shouman wrote: >> Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes: >> >>> On 7/3/2024 1:28 PM, Radey Shouman wrote: >>>> Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes: >>>> >>>>> On 7/2/2024 5:24 PM, Tom Kunich wrote: >>>>>> On Mon Jul 1 21:57:40 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/1/2024 1:12 PM, Tom Kunich wrote: >>>>>>>> As usual the obvious candidates without a shred of knowledge of >>>>>>>> chemistry told you all that I didn't know what I was talking about >>>>>>>> when I said that Silca was making a block that looked like >>>>>>>> Chocolate that converted grease to wax. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have continued to be curious why people that know nothing would >>>>>>>> say things about which they know nothing. Grease and wax asr ONE >>>>>>>> chemical chain from being the same thing. Where the hell do you >>>>>>>> get Candle Wax from - TALLOW - which is animal fat. The >>>>>>>> lubricating grease on a new chain (SRAM no longer put this grease >>>>>>>> on a chain) is petroleum based but the chemistry is the same. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> And what would bring the usual noisome candidates to call Silca >>>>>>>> liars because I reported their product? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's difficult to tell who or what you're talking about, given your >>>>>>> usual total lack of citations, quotations, etc. I suspect it's more of >>>>>>> your fantasies or hallucinations. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But to discuss a matter of fact: "Where the hell do you get Candle Wax >>>>>>> from - TALLOW - which is animal fat" has been wrong for normal >>>>>>> commercial candles for well over 100 years. See >>>>>>> https://www.gregorylefever.com/pdfs/candle.pdf >>>>>>> or https://candles.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Some people still make or value tallow candles. Those are mostly the >>>>>>> sorts of people who weave their own wool to make their own clothes, >>>>>>> raise their own chickens, and tell time using only sundials. Heck, they >>>>>>> probably use downtube friction shifters! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- - Frank Krygowski >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I should not be surprised that because I pointed one of Silca's >>>>>> products is a chemical means of conterting the grease on a new chain >>>>>> into wax, Liebermann and Krygowski call them liars and thieves. >>>>>> Now Frank used ALL of his knowledge gained as a Plant Engineer to >>>>>> cite an article filled with wishes and dreams of early settlers for >>>>>> gaining the gift of light at times other than daylight. Of course >>>>>> people of the 17th century didn't understand very little about >>>>>> chemistry but to someone as slow as Krygowski, his useless citation >>>>>> provided him ALL of rhe knowledge necessary to deny chemistry >>>>>> advances of Silca. >>>>> >>>>> I said nothing about Silca. I merely pointed out that you were wrong >>>>> in your claim that candle wax comes from tallow. As I said, these days >>>>> it doesn't, except in very weird instances. >>>> "Weird" is a very judgemental sort of word, isn't it? Tallow >>>> candles >>>> are still available for sale: >>>> https://thefiltery.com/non-toxic-tallow-candles/ >>> >>> Yes. As I said, "Some people still make or value tallow candles. Those >>> are mostly the sorts of people who weave their own wool to make their >>> own clothes, raise their own chickens, and tell time using only >>> sundials. Heck, they probably use downtube friction shifters!" >> >> Weaving one's own wool implies raising the sheep, shearing, carding and >> spinning the wool, then weaving, then tailoring. That is a much larger >> investment in doing it yourself than merely buying tallow candles on the >> interwebs. Raising and slaughtering a cow, rendering the tallow, >> spinning the wick from home-grown hemp and pouring the candles would be >> comparable, but simpler and less labor intensive. Both activities were >> commonplace a few generations ago. >> >> Raising chickens seems pretty mainstream by comparison, and not unusual >> today. >> >> Telling time using only sundials would be quite eccentric. >> >> Downtube friction shifters are just slightly behind the times; I used >> mine this morning and will again this afternoon. >> >> -- > > > > > I shouldn't have to remind you that Krygowski gives no value to the truth. Only his version of the Goebbels propaganda. Tallow is NOT lard - it is lard that has been midified by the chemicals contained in the ashes that are mixed with it. It is wax though perhaps not as pure and parrafin. https://kitchensubstitute.com/tallow-vs-lard/ -- Andrew Muzi am@yellowjersey.org Open every day since 1 April, 1971