Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v69ise$3dqr1$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.system,comp.sys.mac.advocacy Subject: Re: Is everyone as blissfully ignorant as the Apple zealots are? Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2024 12:51:42 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 25 Message-ID: <v69ise$3dqr1$2@dont-email.me> References: <v66duj$19j2$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <leo4v3Fkdk4U3@mid.individual.net> <v66v8d$1m0h$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v672bj$6e7v$1@solani.org> <v69cnt$3cthk$1@dont-email.me> <v69esn$7sdm$1@solani.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 21:51:43 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="085621f7384e2df0d001de5407d0d000"; logging-data="3599201"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18NN3fJoywpezjZlQfvYwt3KNqTEIS79BA=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:WpbeE5XS4vgzMq/2ThtIg5qa884= In-Reply-To: <v69esn$7sdm$1@solani.org> Content-Language: en-CA Bytes: 2263 On 2024-07-05 11:43, badgolferman wrote: > Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: >> badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote: >> >> [snip typical nonsense] >> >>> >>> Personally I think they are so invested in the perfection of Apple that >>> they cannot bear the thought of there being flaws in its products. If >>> someone exposes such flaws, it invalidates everything they stand for. >> >> The other side of the coin is that some people are so eager to find flaws >> in Apple they forget to check basic facts. Like is this even anything >> within Apple's control? Hint: nope. >> >> > > If Apple software is dependent upon someone else’s software, it’s Apple’s > responsibility to ensure that software is safe. After all, it’s Apple who > tells us they are focused on safety and security. > Which you'll argue while at the same time arguing that Apple is wrong to do what it can to increase safety and security by using an app store.