Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John McCue <jmccue@neutron.jmcunx.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: question about nullptr
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 12:33:11 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <v6bdi7$3qbav$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v6bavg$3pu5i$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: jmclnx@SPAMisBADgmail.com
Injection-Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2024 14:33:11 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1dbac881ce643e5395c10e1b7d5fd7a2";
	logging-data="4009311"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/Ip1TZlMETn82y8dBkNVFp"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.3-20231224 ("Banff") (NetBSD/10.0 (amd64))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LN0yoh/tP5Te/0XXEkBcIdNhCKM=
X-OS-Version: NetBSD 10.0 amd64
Bytes: 1367

Thiago Adams <thiago.adams@gmail.com> wrote:
> If you were creating C code today and could use a C23 compiler, would 
> you use nullptr instead of NULL?

I avoid the use of new c items because I want full
portability.  Some systems may have older compilers.

> I am asking because I think I will keep using NULL.

I will do the same

<snip>

-- 
[t]csh(1) - "An elegant shell, for a more... civilized age."
                        - Paraphrasing Star Wars