Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v6bgq4$oc5$1@panix2.panix.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!panix!.POSTED.panix2.panix.com!panix2.panix.com!not-for-mail From: kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: My Dinner With Marc Andreessen Date: 6 Jul 2024 13:28:36 -0000 Organization: Former users of Netcom shell (1989-2000) Lines: 18 Message-ID: <v6bgq4$oc5$1@panix2.panix.com> References: <slrnv85b2k.1pv.bencollver@svadhyaya.localdomain> <335ed481-557d-7d19-949a-fadba2016d2f@example.net> <v69fbp$3d8jk$1@dont-email.me> <fceb74f9-2c99-98f2-7773-f8d07b7bbc56@example.net> Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com; posting-host="panix2.panix.com:166.84.1.2"; logging-data="21841"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com" Bytes: 1502 D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >They are. One sentence says that free markets become oligopolies (which is >not true) while the other says that government regulated markets (non-free >markets) become oligopolies. But they BOTH can become oligopolies. >Either free markets create them, or non-free markets. If both create them, >this discussion is meaningless. Needless to say, I do not believe so, but >if someone does believe it, I see no point in continuing talking. The natural state of the system is oligopoly. A government can resist this, or it can accelerate it. This is why a government controlled by an informed electorate is so important. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."