Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: question about nullptr
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 16:42:05 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <v6bl3t$3rijo$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v6bavg$3pu5i$1@dont-email.me> <20240706054641.175@kylheku.com>
 <v6bfi1$3qn4u$1@dont-email.me> <l9ciO.7$cr5e.2@fx05.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2024 16:42:06 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ac28dfb64dabbb70118b181eb38e3e1d";
	logging-data="4049528"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/bqYokd8cXKoUpKQd7Txdb"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.8.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:TinmNuIxiSZi5yEK+dlrTlTVYuE=
In-Reply-To: <l9ciO.7$cr5e.2@fx05.iad>
Bytes: 1602

On 06.07.2024 16:04, Scott Lurndal wrote:
> Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> writes:
>>
>> We also used 0 as "universal" pointer value regularly without problems.
> 
> Whereas I spent 6 years programming on an architecture[*] where a
> null pointer was represented in hardware by the value 0xc0eeeeee. 

Yes, but a 0 pointer value has not the meaning of an int value 0.

Janis

> I always
> use the NULL macro in both C and C++ code.
> 
> [*] now obsolete.
>