Article <v6c3ip$3u078$2@dont-email.me>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v6c3ip$3u078$2@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<v6c3ip$3u078$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: BGB <cr88192@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_technology_discussion_=E2=86=92_does_the_world_need?=
 =?UTF-8?B?IGEgIm5ldyIgQyA/?=
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2024 13:47:43 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <v6c3ip$3u078$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v66eci$2qeee$1@dont-email.me> <v67gt1$2vq6a$2@dont-email.me>
 <v687h2$36i6p$1@dont-email.me> <871q48w98e.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
 <v68dsm$37sg2$1@dont-email.me> <87plrsultu.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <v68sft$3a6lh$1@dont-email.me> <87ed87v4wi.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <v6adrm$3ljg6$1@dont-email.me> <v6bta2$3svoi$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2024 20:48:57 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d3c5ef1cde4e45ddc2826fbe07375cf5";
	logging-data="4129000"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18iF1rclbmM71jd0Elg82ztN6azrQt2bqI="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6UkzjZRPymiAoClvMebPqKprnoc=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v6bta2$3svoi$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 1950

On 7/6/2024 12:01 PM, David Brown wrote:
> On 06/07/2024 05:30, BGB wrote:
>>
>> Ironically, I probably should have leaned harder into the "daisy 
>> chained types" interpretation, rather than treating it as an 
>> undesirable implementation tradeoff.
>>
> 
> I once had to use a very limited C compiler that supported arrays, and 
> structs, but not arrays of structs or structs containing arrays.  It was 
> truly a PITA.  A language that has such inconvenient limitations would 
> be unusable for me - I'd rather go back to using BASIC on a ZX Spectrum.
> 

I would not assume going quite that far.