Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Andy H <thewildrover@icloud.com>
Newsgroups: uk.comp.sys.mac,misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Reliable bluetooth headphones/earpods?
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 22:04:29 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 71
Message-ID: <v6evst$g066$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v6due2$am5n$1@dont-email.me>
 <J9OcnVWHPP5dPxf7nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@supernews.com>
 <v6eki7$e9sb$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2024 23:04:29 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7f679e0910c07b1ba012e0af9c773ea6";
	logging-data="524486"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ZXQFRV9ekGxn4axUUs548j+jH9H1rC2g="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:V7DSjRgxanN2Z06tUuSIWDscQbw=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <v6eki7$e9sb$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 4206

On 07/07/2024 18:51:03, Chris wrote:
> Tyrone <none@none.none> wrote:
>> On Jul 7, 2024 at 7:33:22 AM EDT, "Chris" <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I've been fighting for most of the morning to keep my earpods connected to
>>> my phone for more than 5 minutes - not an exaggeration - and am now
>>> contemplating new ones.
>>>
>>> Anyone have recommendations of reliable BT - and I mean rock solid
>>> reliability - headphones/earpods? I mostly use them with my iphone while
>>> commuting, travelling and gardening for mostly music, but also on
>>> teams/zoom calls on my mac. I need them to be small and portable.

How strange. I have been through a similar rabbit hole myself lately.

I think looking at BT5.0> is the way to go.

I have a pair of Tribit XFree Go that actually sound OK, and have been 
stable once connected. They can be a bit tricky with some connections 
thought, and have a habit of locking up.

Apparently Sennheisers can be a bit tricky with getting a reliable 
connection too.

>> I've never had problems with Sony. I have several over-ear headphones (from
>> cheap to expensive) and in-ear buds. All work just fine and sound great.
>>
>> None have ever failed. Not to say that Sony headphones are indestructible.
>> Just reporting my experience.
> 
> Thanks. Others elsewhere have also mentioned Sony. Added to the shortlist.

Yes, the Sony's seem to get quite good reviews (even the CH720 and CH520 
at the lower end). Also check out the Anker Soundcore stuff, they get 
rave reviews (mostly of the 'bang-for-buck' kind of rating though).

>> The main problem with over-ear headphones is
>> that the foam pads eventually fall apart. Some can be replaced, some can't.

I have an old pair of Grado SR60, pads are readily available for those 
(the SR 80 pads also fit, and are reputed to improve sound a bit)

> Yep. Have some AKGs that I love but one ear has fallen apart. I bought a
> pair of Austrian Audio to replace them which are very good, but a bit on
> the bright side.

I also have the AKG K92, and also find them a little brighter on the 
sound (pads also readily available).

Seems that there's a lot of choice, but if your looking for a decent 
sound above the other features, perhaps also look at the Audio Technica 
models, especially the ATH-M50xBT.

I really wanted the Grado GW100X, but sadly a bit out of my budget range.

I ended up getting a pair of Marshal Major IV, as they were a better fit 
with my budget, and seems to tick more boxes on priorities - likewise, 
I'm not interested in ANC and fancy stuff, just a decent sound an 
reliable connection. They're quite comfy too, and can be connected by 
wire if preferred,

These sound just fine to me, not far of the Grado SR60s. There is also 
the Major V out now too, but I think the difference is minimal for the 
cost difference (£139 vs £80).

 From what I can gather the Audio Technica and the Marshall are the only 
two I could find that gave decent sound quality rather than a bunch of 
daft features for the money.

-- 
Andy H