Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Google Gemini reviews Doctor Who - Talons of Weng Chiang
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 22:12:26 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <v6gl39$s6c3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v6bhgk$akq$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>
 <xn0oo1agh6ve4aa002@news.eternal-september.org>
 <v6e02h$2dvb$3@gallifrey.nk.ca> <v6e5le$bqhs$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6eokb$1mc5$4@gallifrey.nk.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 14:12:26 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0e2060d3e53f6e86fbf65d3e630c862a";
	logging-data="924035"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18vkxGOO3F31RZzdXJKNCUsnMaC3PYzm0o="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EN/6gztVzEzCwHWKCi1NaEtE4LI=
In-Reply-To: <v6eokb$1mc5$4@gallifrey.nk.ca>
Bytes: 2527

The Doctor wrote on 8/7/24 5:00 am:
> In article <v6e5le$bqhs$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
> <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>> The Doctor wrote on 7/7/24 10:01 pm:
>>> In article <xn0oo1agh6ve4aa002@news.eternal-september.org>, 
>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>> In article <xn0oo01ux5o0jl2000@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
>>>>> <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This serial blends Sherlock Holmes vibes with classic
>>>>>>> Who's fantastical elements.  The Victorian London setting
>>>>>>> is richly detailed, and the supporting cast is a hoot
>>>>>>> (watch out for Sarah Jane's hilarious disguise!).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Er, Sarah-Jane Smith wasn't in "The Talons of
>>>>>> Weng-Chiang"... unless she was disguised as Leela!
>>>>> 
>>>>> SJS left in Hand of FeaR.  bIG eRROR!
>>>> 
>>>> You posting AI reviews without reading them first, big error.
>>> 
>>> wrong! I am exposing the erroreous AI in action!!
>>> 
>> No YOU aren't, Gobble-de-gook, all YOU, Gobble-de-gook, are
>> exposing is what an ATTENTION SEEKING WHORE YOU are, Gobble-de-gook!!
> 
> Or you cannot read and analyse, Dannyboy.
> 
Neither can YOU, Gobble-de-gook, which is WHY YOU, Gobble-de-gook, get
AI to write YOUR reviews, Gobble-de-gook!!
-- 
Daniel