Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 15:05:17 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <v6go6d$si6r$1@dont-email.me>
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp>
 <FlDiO.56506$GVTf.837@fx01.ams4> <668baa12$2$3285$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
 <v6ghgi$rfqg$2@dont-email.me>
 <17e03e2defe3f3e1$430$498727$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 15:05:17 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1867e14ac94e18ddfeef61a839a68877";
	logging-data="936155"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18SnV4bYKP4Uli/5UPEnfhP"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:jCRnZuOxJIaR/BO+tkIdj5svLyw=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <17e03e2defe3f3e1$430$498727$c2565adb@news.newsdemon.com>
Bytes: 2286

Le 08/07/2024 à 14:57, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 08.07.2024 o 13:11, Python pisze:
>> Le 08/07/2024 à 10:57, J. J. Lodder a écrit :
>>> Paul B. Andersen <relativity@paulba.no> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Den 04.07.2024 15:30, skrev Richard Hachel:
>>>>> Langevin's paradox.
>>>>> The Langevin paradox is a very serious criticism against the theory of
>>>>> relativity.
>>>>
>>>> Langvin's paradox is another name of the "twin paradox".
>>>> In 1911 Langevin gave an example of said "paradox".
>>>
>>> Yes, but the French are often excessively chauvinistic.
>>
>> Lengrand (aka Hachel) is. A quite ridiculous one. Most French
>> are not, obviously (look at the election results :-) )
>>
>>> Nothing is to be taken seriously
>>> unless a French name can be tagged onto it.
>>
>> Fact it that the twin paradox has been pointed out first
> 
> 
> Neither in France, nor in other countries, neither
> between [Scientists] nor
> his enemies anyone noticed, that [Special Relativity]
> was obviously inconsistent.

Simply because it is not. The demented mumble of a senile
Polish crank does not matter you know?