Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v6h6po$v4mv$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,uk.comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Reliable bluetooth headphones/earpods? Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 17:14:32 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 75 Message-ID: <v6h6po$v4mv$1@dont-email.me> References: <v6due2$am5n$1@dont-email.me> <J9OcnVWHPP5dPxf7nZ2dnZfqn_GdnZ2d@supernews.com> <v6eki7$e9sb$1@dont-email.me> <v6evst$g066$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2024 19:14:32 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="effaeb9d21dbd0aea9666f8d88857116"; logging-data="1020639"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+D94jDCkYUsKq8MSMGVTRw4csG9gLxWnA=" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7yPKa4S45fGL5TSR/o9yy8RPd5E= sha1:LfqkwlObQBT267+CSih3DaMDEnI= Bytes: 4576 Andy H <thewildrover@icloud.com> wrote: > On 07/07/2024 18:51:03, Chris wrote: >> Tyrone <none@none.none> wrote: >>> On Jul 7, 2024 at 7:33:22 AM EDT, "Chris" <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I've been fighting for most of the morning to keep my earpods connected to >>>> my phone for more than 5 minutes - not an exaggeration - and am now >>>> contemplating new ones. >>>> >>>> Anyone have recommendations of reliable BT - and I mean rock solid >>>> reliability - headphones/earpods? I mostly use them with my iphone while >>>> commuting, travelling and gardening for mostly music, but also on >>>> teams/zoom calls on my mac. I need them to be small and portable. > > How strange. I have been through a similar rabbit hole myself lately. > > I think looking at BT5.0> is the way to go. > > I have a pair of Tribit XFree Go that actually sound OK, and have been > stable once connected. They can be a bit tricky with some connections > thought, and have a habit of locking up. > > Apparently Sennheisers can be a bit tricky with getting a reliable > connection too. > >>> I've never had problems with Sony. I have several over-ear headphones (from >>> cheap to expensive) and in-ear buds. All work just fine and sound great. >>> >>> None have ever failed. Not to say that Sony headphones are indestructible. >>> Just reporting my experience. >> >> Thanks. Others elsewhere have also mentioned Sony. Added to the shortlist. > > Yes, the Sony's seem to get quite good reviews (even the CH720 and CH520 > at the lower end). Also check out the Anker Soundcore stuff, they get > rave reviews (mostly of the 'bang-for-buck' kind of rating though). > >>> The main problem with over-ear headphones is >>> that the foam pads eventually fall apart. Some can be replaced, some can't. > > I have an old pair of Grado SR60, pads are readily available for those > (the SR 80 pads also fit, and are reputed to improve sound a bit) > >> Yep. Have some AKGs that I love but one ear has fallen apart. I bought a >> pair of Austrian Audio to replace them which are very good, but a bit on >> the bright side. > > I also have the AKG K92, and also find them a little brighter on the > sound (pads also readily available). > > Seems that there's a lot of choice, but if your looking for a decent > sound above the other features, perhaps also look at the Audio Technica > models, especially the ATH-M50xBT. > > I really wanted the Grado GW100X, but sadly a bit out of my budget range. > > I ended up getting a pair of Marshal Major IV, as they were a better fit > with my budget, and seems to tick more boxes on priorities - likewise, > I'm not interested in ANC and fancy stuff, just a decent sound an > reliable connection. They're quite comfy too, and can be connected by > wire if preferred, > > These sound just fine to me, not far of the Grado SR60s. There is also > the Major V out now too, but I think the difference is minimal for the > cost difference (£139 vs £80). > > From what I can gather the Audio Technica and the Marshall are the only > two I could find that gave decent sound quality rather than a bunch of > daft features for the money. All great suggestions, but a bit bulky for my current use case. May have another look at on/over ears in a while as I'm revisiting my music listening options.