Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v6jqr1$1dcp9$3@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Python <python@invalid.org> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 19:08:49 +0200 Organization: CCCP Lines: 54 Message-ID: <v6jqr1$1dcp9$3@dont-email.me> References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <FlDiO.56506$GVTf.837@fx01.ams4> <lf40ddFdu9kU3@mid.individual.net> <Qjq15Muw8aIiGRVOKV0Bu2oT9_k@jntp> <17e093318d04c44e$453$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <v6jjdn$1dcp9$1@dont-email.me> <17e0956e40b4ac96$539$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com> <v6jm2g$1dcp9$2@dont-email.me> <17e09a4b32733fa4$874$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 19:08:49 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="38be9a9982832f091959869971536b2c"; logging-data="1487657"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18K8E4H3GD+2hBv02bQuXhv" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:b8QthnRp/rNswAJi2MPfsb0icO0= In-Reply-To: <17e09a4b32733fa4$874$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 2884 Le 09/07/2024 à 19:05, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : > W dniu 09.07.2024 o 17:47, Python pisze: >> Le 09/07/2024 à 17:35, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >>> W dniu 09.07.2024 o 17:02, Python pisze: >>>> Le 09/07/2024 à 16:54, Maciej Wozniak a écrit : >> ... >>>>> It is. Apart of mumbling inconsistently - >>>>> the idiot didn't understand what yhe >>>>> human age is, how it is determined and >>>>> that clocks have nothing in common with >>>>> that. >>>>> Of course, an age of a human is determined >>>>> by subtracting his birthdate from the >>>>> current date. It always was. >>>> >>>> *facepalm* >>>> >>>> You stupidity is abysmal Wozniak. >>>> >>>> When a person's age is unknown there are biological >>>> ways to estimate it, you know? >> >>> You really think that >>>> these methods are inaccurate? >>> >>> You really think they are not >> >> So you cannot answer. No surprise. > > You fabricate and lie. No surprise. >> >> Aging is a biological process. It matches with stationary> >> (respectively with the person's body) clocks > > No, poor stinker, it doesn't. > No surprise you don't know, of cxourse - > You generally know very little. > > >> As a matter of fact metabolism is a kind of clock. > > No, poor stinker, it is not. > Just like all relativistic morons > you don't know what a clock is. > > And determining of age is still > - subtracting dates. That a fanatic > piece of shit doesn't like it > changes nothing. > Wozniak, you stupidity is beyond all limits.