Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 19:08:49 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <v6jqr1$1dcp9$3@dont-email.me>
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp>
 <FlDiO.56506$GVTf.837@fx01.ams4> <lf40ddFdu9kU3@mid.individual.net>
 <Qjq15Muw8aIiGRVOKV0Bu2oT9_k@jntp>
 <17e093318d04c44e$453$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
 <v6jjdn$1dcp9$1@dont-email.me>
 <17e0956e40b4ac96$539$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
 <v6jm2g$1dcp9$2@dont-email.me>
 <17e09a4b32733fa4$874$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 19:08:49 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="38be9a9982832f091959869971536b2c";
	logging-data="1487657"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18K8E4H3GD+2hBv02bQuXhv"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:b8QthnRp/rNswAJi2MPfsb0icO0=
In-Reply-To: <17e09a4b32733fa4$874$506977$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2884

Le 09/07/2024 à 19:05, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
> W dniu 09.07.2024 o 17:47, Python pisze:
>> Le 09/07/2024 à 17:35, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>>> W dniu 09.07.2024 o 17:02, Python pisze:
>>>> Le 09/07/2024 à 16:54, Maciej Wozniak a écrit :
>> ...
>>>>> It is. Apart of mumbling inconsistently -
>>>>> the idiot didn't understand what yhe
>>>>> human age is, how it is determined and
>>>>> that clocks have nothing in common with
>>>>> that.
>>>>> Of course, an age of a human is determined
>>>>> by subtracting his birthdate from the
>>>>> current date. It always was.
>>>>
>>>> *facepalm*
>>>>
>>>> You stupidity is abysmal Wozniak.
>>>>
>>>> When a person's age is unknown there are biological
>>>> ways to estimate it, you know? 
>>
>>> You really think that
>>>> these methods are inaccurate?
>>>
>>> You really think they are not 
>>
>> So you cannot answer. No surprise.
> 
> You fabricate and lie. No surprise.
>>
>> Aging is a biological process.  It matches with stationary> 
>> (respectively with the person's body) clocks
> 
> No, poor stinker, it doesn't.
> No surprise you don't know, of cxourse -
> You generally know very little.
> 
> 
>> As a matter of fact metabolism is a kind of clock.
> 
> No, poor stinker, it is not.
> Just like all relativistic morons
> you don't know what a clock is.
> 
> And determining of age is still
> - subtracting dates. That a fanatic
> piece of shit doesn't like it
> changes  nothing.
> 

Wozniak, you stupidity is beyond all limits.