Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v6k8eq$1gsq7$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: More complex numbers than reals? Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 14:01:13 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 49 Message-ID: <v6k8eq$1gsq7$6@dont-email.me> References: <v6ihi1$18sp0$6@dont-email.me> <87msmqrbaq.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <0dUETcjzkRZSIY0ZGKDH2IRJuYQ@jntp> <87v81epj5v.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v6k216$1g6tr$3@dont-email.me> <v6k2bh$1g6tr$5@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 23:01:14 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ce358e0d0d9664a700ff455d87f9b3cd"; logging-data="1602375"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19wR4AX/jpnXhVhSFFL7nr1taiILe+QReM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ND9Z8jVKaApOrWAJHQqbL57CXXY= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <v6k2bh$1g6tr$5@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2783 On 7/9/2024 12:17 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: > On 7/9/2024 12:11 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: >> On 7/9/2024 10:30 AM, Ben Bacarisse wrote: >>> WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> writes: >>> >>>> Le 09/07/2024 à 14:37, Ben Bacarisse a écrit : >>>> >>>>> A mathematician, to whom this is a whole new topic, would start by >>>>> asking you what you mean by "more". Without that, they could not >>>>> possibly answer you. >>>> >>>> Good mathematicians could. >>>> >>>>> So, what do you mean by "more" when applied to >>>>> sets like C and R? >>>> >>>> Proper subsets have less elements than their supersets. >>> >>> Let's see if Chris is using that definition. I think he's cleverer than >>> you so he will probably want to be able to say that {1,2,3} has "more" >>> elements than {4,5}. >>> >> >> I was just thinking that there seems to be "more" reals than natural >> numbers. Every natural number is a real, but not all reals are natural >> numbers. >> >> So, wrt the complex. Well... Every complex number has a x, or real >> component. However, not every real has a y, or imaginary component... > > To refine it... NO Real has a y, or imaginary component. The complex > numbers do. So, can be thought of as being more dense? Or space filling > a 2d plane? Reals are 1d. Is 2d "denser" than 1d? The fact that n-ary data can be stored in 1-ary data seems to suggest that the reals are just as dense as the complex numbers? Fair enough? > Or is that the wrong > way to think about it? Thanks. > > >> >> Fair enough? Or still crap? ;^o >