Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v6ldme$1qnq4$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Sequence of sequence, selection and iteration matters Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 10:36:46 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 44 Message-ID: <v6ldme$1qnq4$1@dont-email.me> References: <v6e7va$c4sv$1@dont-email.me> <v6g444$pdc2$1@dont-email.me> <v6go4d$sg7f$1@dont-email.me> <v6ikv5$19h6q$1@dont-email.me> <v6jguf$1ctoi$5@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:36:46 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2cd9eca14ec5ad66c5912bcb5c796241"; logging-data="1924932"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+pmuwADpb0s/uGtK2wt6W+" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:f0i8WEN7sQ+O6hLjyiTCevfH1wE= Bytes: 2776 On 2024-07-09 14:19:59 +0000, olcott said: > On 7/9/2024 1:22 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-07-08 13:04:13 +0000, olcott said: >>> <MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022> >>> If simulating halt decider H correctly simulates its input D >>> until H correctly determines that its simulated D would never >>> stop running unless aborted then >>> >>> H can abort its simulation of D and correctly report that D >>> specifies a non-halting sequence of configurations. >>> </MIT Professor Sipser agreed to ONLY these verbatim words 10/13/2022> >>> >>>> Whether a partial simulation of DDD simulates the return depends >>>> on the simulator. >>> >>> That is false proving that you have insufficient knowledge. >> >> It is true. There are partial simulators that do simulate D(I) to its >> termination (if it terminates) and there are simulators that don't. >> That you cannot imagine something does not mean it can't exist. >> > > No pure function x86 emulator HHH can possibly emulate DDD > to its termination. > > _DDD() > [00002163] 55 push ebp ; housekeeping > [00002164] 8bec mov ebp,esp ; housekeeping > [00002166] 6863210000 push 00002163 ; push DDD > [0000216b] e853f4ffff call 000015c3 ; call HHH(DDD) > [00002170] 83c404 add esp,+04 > [00002173] 5d pop ebp > [00002174] c3 ret > Size in bytes:(0018) [00002174] An emulator can take a shortcut when it has to emulate a call to a fuction it knows. In case it detects a call to itself it may simply assume (correctly or incorrectly) that the function returns and emulate the instructions after the call. -- Mikko