Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v6mlk6$21d9q$1@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v6mlk6$21d9q$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article 
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is correctly rejected as
 non-halting.
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 13:58:14 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <v6mlk6$21d9q$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v6m7si$1uq86$2@dont-email.me> <v6mhc7$20hbo$2@dont-email.me>
 <v6mito$bbr$1@news.muc.de> <v6mjlg$20sio$2@dont-email.me>
 <v6mlfj$bbr$2@news.muc.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 20:58:15 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1ca7ba779153ded89a6e04f3275941c5";
	logging-data="2143546"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ayarOTMl9cv9O3t1CO7oo"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1WUabpa9XMjsJM2Vwm/O4jPhqUE=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <v6mlfj$bbr$2@news.muc.de>
Bytes: 2237

On 7/10/2024 1:55 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Fred. Zwarts <F.Zwarts@hetnet.nl> wrote:
>> Op 10.jul.2024 om 20:12 schreef Alan Mackenzie:
>>> [ Followup-To: set ]
> 
>>> In comp.theory Fred. Zwarts <F.Zwarts@hetnet.nl> wrote:
> 
>>> [ .... ]
> 
>>>> Proving that the simulation is incorrect. Because a correct simulation
>>>> would not abort a halting program halfway its simulation.
> 
>>> Just for clarity, a correct simulation wouldn't abort a non-halting
>>> program either, would it?  Or have I misunderstood this correctness?
> 
>>> [ .... ]
> 
> 
>> A non-halting program cannot be simulated correctly in a finite time.
>> So, it depends whether we can call it a correct simulation, when it does
>> not abort. But, for some meaning of 'correct', indeed, a simulator
>> should not abort a non-halting program either.
> 
> OK, thanks!
> 

In other words he is saying that when you do
1 step correctly you did 0 steps correctly.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer