| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v6mm02$21cpb$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: bart <bc@freeuk.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_technology_discussion_=E2=86=92_does_the_world_need?= =?UTF-8?B?IGEgIm5ldyIgQyA/?= Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 20:04:35 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 53 Message-ID: <v6mm02$21cpb$1@dont-email.me> References: <v66eci$2qeee$1@dont-email.me> <v6ard1$3ngh6$4@dont-email.me> <v6b0jv$3nnt6$1@dont-email.me> <87h6d2uox5.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <v6d779$6rk5$2@dont-email.me> <v6e76u$c0i9$1@dont-email.me> <v6esqm$fian$2@dont-email.me> <v6f7vg$hgam$1@dont-email.me> <20240707164747.258@kylheku.com> <v6gl83$s72a$1@dont-email.me> <v6h8ao$ur1v$1@dont-email.me> <v6jhk3$1drd6$1@dont-email.me> <v6jiud$1dsjb$1@dont-email.me> <877cdur1z9.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v6joi4$1epoj$1@dont-email.me> <871q42qy33.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v6k6i0$1h4d3$1@dont-email.me> <87ed82p28y.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v6m03l$1tf05$1@dont-email.me> <87r0c1nzjj.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v6m716$1urj4$1@dont-email.me> <86ikxd8czu.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v6mggd$20g3f$1@dont-email.me> <20240710213910.00000afd@yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 21:04:35 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ded9e1848a26cfa2c70264cde0490f0f"; logging-data="2143019"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Ki/Ek3/aXQkabDZHy00g8" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:H8N1yHgwY1VrzhOQQX4F1AYy0bw= In-Reply-To: <20240710213910.00000afd@yahoo.com> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 4041 On 10/07/2024 19:39, Michael S wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 18:30:54 +0100 > bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote: > >> On 10/07/2024 16:48, Tim Rentsch wrote: >>> bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes: >>> >>>> I earlier asked this: >>>> >>>> "So if arrays aren't passed by value in C, and they aren't passed >>>> by reference, then how the hell ARE they passed?!" >>> >>> They aren't. C allows lots of things to be passed as an argument >>> to a function: several varieties of numeric values, structs, >>> unions, and pointers, including both pointers to object types and >>> pointers to function types. C does not have a way for a function >>> to take an argument that is either an array or a function. There >>> is a way to take pointers to those things, but not the things >>> themselves. Arrays and functions are second-class values in C. >> >> That's a good point. It's not just arrays that can't be passed by >> value (because the language says so) but also functions (because its >> not meaningful). >> >> Yet, although pointers to arrays and function can be passed (without >> even doing anything special like using &), you are not allowed to say >> that anything is passed by reference in C! >> >> The automatic conversion to a pointer, which is also a feature of >> true pass-by-reference, doesn't count. >> >> Not needing an explicit deref inside the callee (another >> characteristic of pass-by-reference) doesn't count either. > > It does not count, because automatic conversion to a pointer is not > something that happens only during parameter passing. For arrays, it > happens in all contexts except sizeof(). For functions, it happens in > all contexts except function call. Or, may be, including function call, > in this case (but not in case of arrays) it depends on point of view. > Suppose that was to happen in all contexts, not just for arrays and functions, but for all types. That means that if A, B, C were numbers, then any call such as F(A, B, C) would pass the addresses of the numbers rather than their values. According to what people have said, C would STILL be a language that passed thing by value, and never by automatic reference. Yet in my scenario that now sounds ludicrous.