| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v6nb5t$24qor$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Moebius <invalid@example.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: More complex numbers than reals? Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 03:06:05 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 7 Message-ID: <v6nb5t$24qor$2@dont-email.me> References: <v6ihi1$18sp0$6@dont-email.me> <87msmqrbaq.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <0dUETcjzkRZSIY0ZGKDH2IRJuYQ@jntp> <87v81epj5v.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v6k216$1g6tr$3@dont-email.me> <878qyap1tg.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v6mu4b$22opo$2@dont-email.me> <871q40olca.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v6n880$23rgt$2@dont-email.me> <87jzhsn4bn.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <v6naap$23rgt$5@dont-email.me> Reply-To: invalid@example.invalid MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 03:06:06 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2b43c9dd34f25362f42493cf5322921d"; logging-data="2255643"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1982P/SXv2fWk+kw8uusLHR" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:kZT7joK4Iu+GONNVMkX/6TPK/xA= Content-Language: de-DE In-Reply-To: <v6naap$23rgt$5@dont-email.me> Bytes: 1571 Am 11.07.2024 um 02:51 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson: > What about dropping the word more in favor of density, or granularity of > an infinite set? The reals are denser, or more granular than the > rationals and naturals? Yeah, makes sense.