Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Moebius <invalid@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: More complex numbers than reals?
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 03:08:18 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <v6nba2$24qoq$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v6ihi1$18sp0$6@dont-email.me> <87msmqrbaq.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <0dUETcjzkRZSIY0ZGKDH2IRJuYQ@jntp> <87v81epj5v.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <v6k216$1g6tr$3@dont-email.me> <878qyap1tg.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <v6mu4b$22opo$2@dont-email.me> <871q40olca.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <v6n880$23rgt$2@dont-email.me> <87jzhsn4bn.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <v6naap$23rgt$5@dont-email.me> <v6nb5t$24qor$2@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: invalid@example.invalid
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2024 03:08:18 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2b43c9dd34f25362f42493cf5322921d";
	logging-data="2255642"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX197eq4u2HsZSLydBBd9b/RV"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:eNMtabP9jzXNCr0qs8eCS5Jv6NY=
Content-Language: de-DE
In-Reply-To: <v6nb5t$24qor$2@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 1805

Am 11.07.2024 um 03:06 schrieb Moebius:
> Am 11.07.2024 um 02:51 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
> 
>> What about dropping the word more in favor of density, or granularity 
>> of an infinite set? The reals are denser, or more granular than the 
>> rationals and naturals?
> 
> Yeah, makes sense.

On the other hand there are (indeed) "more" reals (in a certain sense) 
than naturals and/or rationals. :-)

So this "more" allows for more "granularity". :-P