Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v6r00l$hq6n$2@solani.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweak.nl!217.73.144.44.MISMATCH!feeder.ecngs.de!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!168.119.53.7.MISMATCH!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.prolog
Subject: Corona isn't over 2024 (Was: French Philosophy in 2024)
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 12:20:07 +0200
Message-ID: <v6r00l$hq6n$2@solani.org>
References: <b406aa35-c39b-46f3-862f-1cc4b75143ae@googlegroups.com>
 <1b7ce2bd-722b-4c2e-b853-12fc2232752bn@googlegroups.com>
 <v6731e$6eft$1@solani.org> <v6qst4$hoan$2@solani.org>
 <v6qth3$hoo1$2@solani.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 10:20:05 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="583895"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:taMqMBZLBj4Nk0xgnKKw5+ZWs9M=
In-Reply-To: <v6qth3$hoo1$2@solani.org>
X-User-ID: eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BLtEBgcnga/xJ254qDCYPDnE77oDoX08t4rXLHmHdELUpDppn5DCgOt3fD62x22SWOyA9f+BYW
Bytes: 5257
Lines: 137

Hi,

In 2023 Dr. Ben Goertzel praised back to
normal, today in 2024 everybody has mysterious
eyeinfections and a new wave is reported:

Flirt-Varianten: Sommer-Coronawelle nimmt Fahrt auf
https://www.mdr.de/wissen/medizin-gesundheit/corona-fallzahlen-sommerwelle-100.html

Bye

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> Actually thridness is not only the art of making
> three-fold divisions. Usually one aims a finding
> a 3 that is the relation between 1 and 2, so that
> 
> we have this relation satisfied:
> 
>     3(1, 2)
> 
> Of course we can have the stance, and say that |-
> does that already. Only |- is highly ambigious,
> if you see Γ |- α you don't know what was the last
> 
> inference rule applied. But for proof extraction
> you want exactly know that.
> 
> Bye
> 
> P.S.: And Peirce isn't wrong when he says thirdness
> is enough, just take set theory, which can do all
> of mathematics? Its based on  this thirdness only:
> 
>     x ∈ y
> 
> The set membership. But set membership is as ugly as |-,
> it also doesn't say why an element belongs to a set.
> 
> LoL
> 
> Mild Shock schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Now I had an extremly resilient correspondent, who
>> wants to do proof extraction, but at the same
>> time refuses to learn the Curry-Howard isomorphism.
>>
>> But its so easy, was just watching:
>>
>> Hyperon Session with Dr. Ben Goertzel
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Uy3j4WCiXQ
>>
>> At t=1853 he mentions C. S. Peirce thirdness, which
>> you can use to explain the Curry-Howard isomorphism:
>>
>>
>> 1 *\        Γ = Context
>>    | \
>>    |  * 3    t = λ-Expression
>>    | /
>> 2 */        α = Type
>>
>>
>> The above is a trikonic visualization of the judgement
>> Γ |- t : α, applying the art of making three-fold divisions.
>>
>> But I guess C. S. Peirce is not read in France, since
>> it requires English. Or maybe there is a french translation?
>>
>> Bye
>>
>> Mild Shock schrieb:
>>>
>>> Could be a wake-up call this many participants
>>> already in the commitee, that the whole logic
>>> world was asleep for many years:
>>>
>>> Non-Classical Logics. Theory and Applications XI,
>>> 5-8 September 2024, Lodz (Poland)
>>> https://easychair.org/cfp/NCL24
>>>
>>> Why is Minimal Logic at the core of many things?
>>> Because it is the logic of Curry-Howard isomoprhism
>>> for symple types:
>>>
>>> ----------------
>>> Γ ∪ { A } ⊢ A
>>>
>>> Γ ∪ { A } ⊢ B
>>> ----------------
>>> Γ ⊢ A → B
>>>
>>> Γ ⊢ A → B           Δ ⊢ A
>>> ----------------------------
>>> Γ ∪ Δ ⊢ B
>>>
>>> And funny things can happen, especially when people
>>> hallucinate duality or think symmetry is given, for
>>> example in newer inventions such as λμ-calculus,
>>>
>>> but then omg ~~p => p is nevertheless not provable,
>>> because they forgot an inference rule. LoL
>>>
>>> Recommended reading so far:
>>>
>>> Propositional Logics Related to Heyting’s and Johansson’s
>>> February 2008 - Krister Segerberg
>>> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228036664
>>>
>>> The Logic of Church and Curry
>>> Jonathan P. Seldin - 2009
>>> https://www.sciencedirect.com/handbook/handbook-of-the-history-of-logic/vol/5/suppl/C 
>>>
>>>
>>> Meanwhile I am going back to my tinkering with my
>>> Prolog system, which even provides a more primitive
>>> logic than minimal logic, pure Prolog is minimal
>>>
>>> logic without embedded implication.
>>>
>>> Mild Shock schrieb:
>>>>
>>>> Your new Scrum Master is here! - ChatGPT, 2023
>>>> https://www.bbntimes.com/companies/ai-will-make-agile-coaches-and-scrum-masters-redundant-in-less-than-2-years 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> LoL
>>>>
>>>> Thomas Alva Edison schrieb am Dienstag, 10. Juli 2018 um 15:28:05 
>>>> UTC+2:
>>>>> Prolog Class Signpost - American Style 2018
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CxQKltWI0NA
>>>
>>
>