Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v6rnj6$344nh$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: OT: EV Charging Stations Stripped of Copper Cables
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:02:30 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 65
Message-ID: <v6rnj6$344nh$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v64kvk$2cc3j$2@dont-email.me> <v6ffko$ii8v$1@dont-email.me>
	<v6hfnm$10h93$2@dont-email.me> <v6icsb$18bnm$1@dont-email.me>
	<v6ivke$1b3ak$1@dont-email.me> <iufq8jhjsia1qdm4pt2vgrovkhrpt8nj8u@4ax.com>
	<v6mfov$20818$3@dont-email.me> <6tht8j9kcaomraffha67s0ih4qeesl8hj6@4ax.com>
	<v6n40v$20818$7@dont-email.me> <rf9u8jh9anq08pcgr3ommovhtp2para8h8@4ax.com>
	<v6o1r7$2blhc$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 19:02:30 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="757dc55aeeb88a32e75a5c139c1022d5";
	logging-data="3281649"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19MjVqdUZvT/qOj7ShKktxBaUGE3qwP4Js="
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CIMZCLOV9J4DNrffR3w79HBWB8w=
Bytes: 3995

On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 17:32:47 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:

> On 11/07/2024 10:32 am, john larkin wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 23:04:00 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 10:48:09 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:18:23 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
>>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 06:52:49 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 09:24:30 -0000 (UTC), RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 9 Jul 2024 at 05:04:24 BST, Bill Sloman wrote:
> 
> <snip>
>> A bigger problem is kids getting bogus degrees, like film-making and
>> sociology and journalism and comparative literature and music theory.
> 
> John Larkin doesn't understand them, and doesn't see the point. He had
> much the same problem with the chemistry part of his science degree.
> 
>> Even "computer science" can be useless.
> 
> John Larkin doesn't understand a lot of that either.
> 
>> I think some people are realizing that they should not borrow a fortune
>> to attend college but be apprentices in a trade, and actually get a
>> job.
> 
> A trade education takes time, and tends to have some academic content.
> The UK and Australia re-named a lot of their trade schools as technical
> universities, which wasn't a good idea.
> 
>>>> Yes, the debt will have consequences too. It keeps increasing and can
>>>> never be paid back. Economists keep getting stupider too.
>>>
>>> "Top economists" are no different from the "top climate scientists" -
>>> they're paid handsomely for parroting whatever the Globalists at the
>>> WEF tell them.
>> 
>> Given a graph of usefulness vs expertise, some fields have a peak
>> pretty soon and then drop off.
> 
> John Larkin's grasp of what is actually useful is down there with
> Cursitor Doom's. He's certainly no more capable of understanding what
> climate scientists are telling us than Cursitor Doom is.
> 
> John Larkin did get a science degree from Tulane, but he was pre
> selective about the bits he paid attention to, and climate science
> wasn't an area where he paid any attention.
> 
> --
> Bill Sloman, Sydney

The 'climate scientists' are being paid to lay on the doom as thickly as 
possible. Their 'research' is heavily compromised. That's why I prefer 
data from *before* this area became politicized, but I wouldn't expect you 
to understand that, Bill. 
There's no cause for alarm and CO2 at ~400ppm is harmless. Its levels are 
the same now as when Lincoln was president, despite all the pollution 
pumped out during the 20th century.