Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v6tvig$3imib$13@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v6tvig$3imib$13@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article 
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic,comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as
 non-halting V2
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:30:56 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <v6tvig$3imib$13@dont-email.me>
References: <v6rg65$32o1o$3@dont-email.me>
 <97e0632d0d889d141bdc6005ce6e513c53867798@i2pn2.org>
 <v6sdlu$382g0$1@dont-email.me> <v6td3a$3ge79$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6tp1j$3imib$2@dont-email.me>
 <1972cbc6017755353916d2ba8b055fbaca0711df@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 15:30:57 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="52398669a80ff5113c36343403a598c9";
	logging-data="3758667"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+a4OsPJjY2z3pEBGIcNMGL"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:zBmCUoqb6T92mh5kfJW1ZHqC2KE=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <1972cbc6017755353916d2ba8b055fbaca0711df@i2pn2.org>

On 7/13/2024 8:15 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 7/13/24 7:39 AM, olcott wrote:
>> On 7/13/2024 3:15 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>
>>> This is double talk, because no HHH can possibly exist that simulates 
>>> itself correctly.
>>
>> Your definition of correct contradicts the semantics of
>> the x86 language making it wrong.
>>
> 
> No your ideas of the x86 language contradicts the actual sematic of the 
> language.
> 
> Where does it ever even imply that a partial emulation correctly 
> predicts the behavior of the full program?
> 

You switch from disagreeing with the x86 language to disagreeing
that all deciders must halt.

*This proves that every rebuttal is wrong somewhere*
No DDD instance of each HHH/DDD pair of the infinite set of
every HHH/DDD pair ever reaches past its own machine address of
0000216b and halts thus proving that every HHH is correct to
reject its input DDD as non-halting.


-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer