Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD correctly emulated by HHH is Correctly rejected as
 non-halting V2
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:34:55 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <v6tvpv$3imib$14@dont-email.me>
References: <v6rg65$32o1o$3@dont-email.me>
 <97e0632d0d889d141bdc6005ce6e513c53867798@i2pn2.org>
 <v6sdlu$382g0$1@dont-email.me> <v6td3a$3ge79$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6tp1j$3imib$2@dont-email.me> <v6trdu$3irhh$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6tu01$3imib$11@dont-email.me>
 <a177dd76613794d6bb877c65ffe6c587a8f31bc1@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 15:34:55 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="52398669a80ff5113c36343403a598c9";
	logging-data="3758667"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/EM9+vvFI8ZCiiniqZE4Ay"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:EMgUz/Eq2KRbfAHjqhD9Zi/noF8=
In-Reply-To: <a177dd76613794d6bb877c65ffe6c587a8f31bc1@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US

On 7/13/2024 8:24 AM, joes wrote:
> Am Sat, 13 Jul 2024 08:04:01 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>> On 7/13/2024 7:20 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>> Op 13.jul.2024 om 13:39 schreef olcott:
>>>> On 7/13/2024 3:15 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>> Op 13.jul.2024 om 01:19 schreef olcott:
>>>>>> On 7/12/2024 5:56 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/12/24 10:56 AM, olcott wrote:
> 
>>> You have a wrong understanding of the semantics of the x86 language.
>>> You think that the x86 language specifies that skipping instructions do
>>> not change the behaviour of a program.
> Do you understand that a simulator that aborts does not run forever?
> 
>> As soon as the decider correctly determines that itself would never halt
>> unless is aborts the simulation of its input the decider is required to
>> abort this simulation.
> Which decider is aborting here, the simulated or the outer one?
> A decider always halts, so it cannot find itself non-halting.
> 

The executed decider is always correct to abort the
simulation of any damn thing that would cause itself
to never halt.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer