Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Andrew <andrew@spam.net>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: People ask if the overpriced underpowered iPhone SE can compete with Android
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 14:31:19 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: BWH Usenet Archive (https://usenet.blueworldhosting.com)
Message-ID: <v6u33m$qjs$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
References: <v6kgao$imf$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v6khv9$e13s$1@solani.org> <v6kk41$r2r$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v6mgb7$20ff2$4@dont-email.me> <xn0oo5key3b3y8o002@reader443.eternal-september.org> <v6mic1$20qdr$1@dont-email.me> <lf87a0F3evlU1@mid.individual.net> <v6ms62$ecjs$1@solani.org> <v6u2ri$mj1$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 14:31:19 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com;
	logging-data="27260"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blueworldhosting.com"
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IDs5qOBtGpQi0aeCIL1cbasZ7Mk= sha256:tU9qIvEUx6ftf0vLC2AmvSfqvrZMH5eZi0mmqLtHnN8=
	sha1:bXHE3SvfUKhA9Zphh5e6YfNIGyw= sha256:A4ZNh0oLLleFAeZ542euS1euRo5G71XhLXHOedBwwms=
X-Face: VQ}*Ueh[4uTOa]Md([|$jb%rw~ksq}bzqA;z-.*8JM`4+zL[`N\ORHCI80}]}$]$e5]/i#v  qdYsE`yh@ZL3L{H:So{yN)b=AZJtpaP98ch_4W}
Bytes: 2730
Lines: 24

Andrew wrote on Sat, 13 Jul 2024 14:26:59 -0000 (UTC) :

> Note to sensible people:
>  Do not allow mathematically challenged people to lie to you that a 2%
>  increase in RAM can offset a 100% difference in RAM - it's just absurd.
> 
>  Likewise with the battery where the mathematically inept zealots claim
>  a 3% increase in battery efficiency offsets a 304% increase in capacity.
> 
>  The fact they resort to such absurd arguments (which nospam was infamous
>  for) shows how much they actually *hate* Apple produces overpriced crap.

A word was accidentally omitted from the description of how absurd and
desperate the child-like zealots are in defending Apple's poor performance.

Instead of:
 "Do not allow mathematically challenged people to lie to you that a 2%
 increase in RAM can offset a 100% difference in RAM - it's just absurd."

I accidentally omitted the word "efficiency"... 
 Do not allow mathematically challenged people to lie to you that a 2%
 increase in RAM efficiency can offset a 100% difference in RAM.

The absurdity of their arguments, which nospam was infamous for, show how
utterly *desperate* they are to defend Apple's many flaws to the death.