Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v6ua44$3lm73$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: OT: EV Charging Stations Stripped of Copper Cables
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 16:31:00 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 71
Message-ID: <v6ua44$3lm73$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v64kvk$2cc3j$2@dont-email.me> <v6ffko$ii8v$1@dont-email.me>
	<v6hfnm$10h93$2@dont-email.me> <v6icsb$18bnm$1@dont-email.me>
	<v6ivke$1b3ak$1@dont-email.me> <iufq8jhjsia1qdm4pt2vgrovkhrpt8nj8u@4ax.com>
	<v6mfov$20818$3@dont-email.me> <6tht8j9kcaomraffha67s0ih4qeesl8hj6@4ax.com>
	<v6n40v$20818$7@dont-email.me> <rf9u8jh9anq08pcgr3ommovhtp2para8h8@4ax.com>
	<v6o1r7$2blhc$5@dont-email.me> <v6rnj6$344nh$1@dont-email.me>
	<v6suq5$3e2fd$4@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 18:31:00 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="48c830aa13f088d2ed8361dbdc50bed1";
	logging-data="3856611"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/1rwXRvVbSC891T89SROqSrDQ7lYr1EXY="
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:W+1B3jGOqlzdyQww4L1kFS0E2xg=
Bytes: 4377

On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 14:11:36 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:

> On 13/07/2024 3:02 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>> On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 17:32:47 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
>> 
>>> On 11/07/2024 10:32 am, john larkin wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 23:04:00 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
>>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 10:48:09 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:18:23 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
>>>>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 06:52:49 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 09:24:30 -0000 (UTC), RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 9 Jul 2024 at 05:04:24 BST, Bill Sloman wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
>>>> Given a graph of usefulness vs expertise, some fields have a peak
>>>> pretty soon and then drop off.
>>>
>>> John Larkin's grasp of what is actually useful is down there with
>>> Cursitor Doom's. He's certainly no more capable of understanding what
>>> climate scientists are telling us than Cursitor Doom is.
>>>
>>> John Larkin did get a science degree from Tulane, but he was pre
>>> selective about the bits he paid attention to, and climate science
>>> wasn't an area where he paid any attention.
>> 
>> The 'climate scientists' are being paid to lay on the doom as thickly
>> as possible. Their 'research' is heavily compromised. That's why I
>> prefer data from *before* this area became politicized, but I wouldn't
>> expect you to understand that, Bill.
> 
> This is just one more of your demented conspiracy theories. If you knew
> a bit more you'd be aware that the area didn't get "politicised" until
> the late 1990's when there had been enough anthropogenic global warming
> for it show up over the natural variation form effects like the El
> Nino/La Nina alternation and the slower Atlantic Multidecal Oscillation.
> 
> Because you don't understand this, you ignore all climate science
> observations since the very crude work from the 1890's.
> 
> Climate scientists have always been academics, and they publish
> primarily for other academics. In the last twenty years, the media has
> has publicised their work, adding in their own preference for finding
> sensational implications in the published data (not always correctly).
> 
>> There's no cause for alarm and CO2 at ~400ppm is harmless. Its levels
>> are the same now as when Lincoln was president, despite all the
>> pollution pumped out during the 20th century.
> 
> Wrong.
> 
> https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/
> 
> https://capegrim.csiro.au/
> 
> --
> Bill Sloman, Sydney

Yeah, yeah. I've seen all that CRAP. The NASA site's the same; all 
spouting the same complete nonsense as directed by your pal, Klaus Schwab 
(who fancies himself as some sort of Bond villain) and his cronies.
Do some proper, reference book-based research for a change and you'll see 
a completely different picture emerge.