Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v6ua44$3lm73$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,uk.d-i-y Subject: Re: OT: EV Charging Stations Stripped of Copper Cables Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 16:31:00 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 71 Message-ID: <v6ua44$3lm73$2@dont-email.me> References: <v64kvk$2cc3j$2@dont-email.me> <v6ffko$ii8v$1@dont-email.me> <v6hfnm$10h93$2@dont-email.me> <v6icsb$18bnm$1@dont-email.me> <v6ivke$1b3ak$1@dont-email.me> <iufq8jhjsia1qdm4pt2vgrovkhrpt8nj8u@4ax.com> <v6mfov$20818$3@dont-email.me> <6tht8j9kcaomraffha67s0ih4qeesl8hj6@4ax.com> <v6n40v$20818$7@dont-email.me> <rf9u8jh9anq08pcgr3ommovhtp2para8h8@4ax.com> <v6o1r7$2blhc$5@dont-email.me> <v6rnj6$344nh$1@dont-email.me> <v6suq5$3e2fd$4@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 18:31:00 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="48c830aa13f088d2ed8361dbdc50bed1"; logging-data="3856611"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/1rwXRvVbSC891T89SROqSrDQ7lYr1EXY=" User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Cancel-Lock: sha1:W+1B3jGOqlzdyQww4L1kFS0E2xg= Bytes: 4377 On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 14:11:36 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote: > On 13/07/2024 3:02 am, Cursitor Doom wrote: >> On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 17:32:47 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote: >> >>> On 11/07/2024 10:32 am, john larkin wrote: >>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 23:04:00 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom >>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 10:48:09 -0700, john larkin wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:18:23 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom >>>>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 06:52:49 -0700, john larkin wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 09:24:30 -0000 (UTC), RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 9 Jul 2024 at 05:04:24 BST, Bill Sloman wrote: > > <snip> > >>>> Given a graph of usefulness vs expertise, some fields have a peak >>>> pretty soon and then drop off. >>> >>> John Larkin's grasp of what is actually useful is down there with >>> Cursitor Doom's. He's certainly no more capable of understanding what >>> climate scientists are telling us than Cursitor Doom is. >>> >>> John Larkin did get a science degree from Tulane, but he was pre >>> selective about the bits he paid attention to, and climate science >>> wasn't an area where he paid any attention. >> >> The 'climate scientists' are being paid to lay on the doom as thickly >> as possible. Their 'research' is heavily compromised. That's why I >> prefer data from *before* this area became politicized, but I wouldn't >> expect you to understand that, Bill. > > This is just one more of your demented conspiracy theories. If you knew > a bit more you'd be aware that the area didn't get "politicised" until > the late 1990's when there had been enough anthropogenic global warming > for it show up over the natural variation form effects like the El > Nino/La Nina alternation and the slower Atlantic Multidecal Oscillation. > > Because you don't understand this, you ignore all climate science > observations since the very crude work from the 1890's. > > Climate scientists have always been academics, and they publish > primarily for other academics. In the last twenty years, the media has > has publicised their work, adding in their own preference for finding > sensational implications in the published data (not always correctly). > >> There's no cause for alarm and CO2 at ~400ppm is harmless. Its levels >> are the same now as when Lincoln was president, despite all the >> pollution pumped out during the 20th century. > > Wrong. > > https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/ > > https://capegrim.csiro.au/ > > -- > Bill Sloman, Sydney Yeah, yeah. I've seen all that CRAP. The NASA site's the same; all spouting the same complete nonsense as directed by your pal, Klaus Schwab (who fancies himself as some sort of Bond villain) and his cronies. Do some proper, reference book-based research for a change and you'll see a completely different picture emerge.