Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: OT: EV Charging Stations Stripped of Copper Cables
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 14:15:37 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 102
Message-ID: <v6vjd9$3vr4c$3@dont-email.me>
References: <v64kvk$2cc3j$2@dont-email.me> <v6ffko$ii8v$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6hfnm$10h93$2@dont-email.me> <v6icsb$18bnm$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6ivke$1b3ak$1@dont-email.me> <iufq8jhjsia1qdm4pt2vgrovkhrpt8nj8u@4ax.com>
 <v6mfov$20818$3@dont-email.me> <6tht8j9kcaomraffha67s0ih4qeesl8hj6@4ax.com>
 <v6n40v$20818$7@dont-email.me> <rf9u8jh9anq08pcgr3ommovhtp2para8h8@4ax.com>
 <v6o1r7$2blhc$5@dont-email.me> <v6rnj6$344nh$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6suq5$3e2fd$4@dont-email.me> <v6ua44$3lm73$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 06:15:39 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1379ac5737e1afe87bf41eb3f217bbc2";
	logging-data="4189324"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX184WAqd0vtnBm9r839RHqHnsfzElqD6QNg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xcPAfpLxFdg9JAS7RpEF4waJ6+k=
In-Reply-To: <v6ua44$3lm73$2@dont-email.me>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 240713-4, 13/7/2024), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 5931

On 14/07/2024 2:31 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 14:11:36 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
> 
>> On 13/07/2024 3:02 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>>> On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 17:32:47 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/07/2024 10:32 am, john larkin wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 23:04:00 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
>>>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 10:48:09 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:18:23 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
>>>>>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 06:52:49 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 09:24:30 -0000 (UTC), RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 9 Jul 2024 at 05:04:24 BST, Bill Sloman wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>>> Given a graph of usefulness vs expertise, some fields have a peak
>>>>> pretty soon and then drop off.
>>>>
>>>> John Larkin's grasp of what is actually useful is down there with
>>>> Cursitor Doom's. He's certainly no more capable of understanding what
>>>> climate scientists are telling us than Cursitor Doom is.
>>>>
>>>> John Larkin did get a science degree from Tulane, but he was pre
>>>> selective about the bits he paid attention to, and climate science
>>>> wasn't an area where he paid any attention.
>>>
>>> The 'climate scientists' are being paid to lay on the doom as thickly
>>> as possible. Their 'research' is heavily compromised. That's why I
>>> prefer data from *before* this area became politicized, but I wouldn't
>>> expect you to understand that, Bill.
>>
>> This is just one more of your demented conspiracy theories. If you knew
>> a bit more you'd be aware that the area didn't get "politicised" until
>> the late 1990's when there had been enough anthropogenic global warming
>> for it show up over the natural variation form effects like the El
>> Nino/La Nina alternation and the slower Atlantic Multidecal Oscillation.
>>
>> Because you don't understand this, you ignore all climate science
>> observations since the very crude work from the 1890's.
>>
>> Climate scientists have always been academics, and they publish
>> primarily for other academics. In the last twenty years, the media has
>> has publicised their work, adding in their own preference for finding
>> sensational implications in the published data (not always correctly).
>>
>>> There's no cause for alarm and CO2 at ~400ppm is harmless. Its levels
>>> are the same now as when Lincoln was president, despite all the
>>> pollution pumped out during the 20th century.
>>
>> Wrong.
>>
>> https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/
>>
>> https://capegrim.csiro.au/
> 
> Yeah, yeah. I've seen all that CRAP.

You do like to claim that it is CRAP. If you had any grasp of reality, 
you'd concentrate your attention on areas where you weren't an ignorant 
nitwit.

> The NASA site's the same; all spouting the same complete nonsense as directed by your pal, Klaus Schwab
> (who fancies himself as some sort of Bond villain) and his cronies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klaus_Schwab

I've never heard of him. The Manua Loa observations were started by 
Charles Keeling in 1958 (when Schwab was 20, and not in a position to 
influence anything much in the USA). The Cape Grim data starts from 
1980, and mainly serves to show that the Southern Hemisphere has rather 
less seasonal variation in CO2 level than the North. Schwab wouldn't 
have had much influence in Australia at the time.

> Do some proper, reference book-based research for a change and you'll see
> a completely different picture emerge.

I've been doing proper book-based research since I started my 
undergraduate education in 1960. You clearly haven't got a clue what 
this involves. The "picture" that has emerged for you is the one that 
fossil carbon industry wants you to see (for fairly obvious commercial 
reasons). If you'd ever had any training in critical thinking, you 
wouldn't be quite such a gullible sucker.

The Manua Loa and Cape Grim results were first published in printed 
scientific journals, which you don't seem to have bothered to read.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney


-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software.
www.norton.com