Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v709e0$3lr4$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,uk.d-i-y Subject: Re: OT: EV Charging Stations Stripped of Copper Cables Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 20:31:27 +1000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 95 Message-ID: <v709e0$3lr4$2@dont-email.me> References: <v64kvk$2cc3j$2@dont-email.me> <v6ffko$ii8v$1@dont-email.me> <v6hfnm$10h93$2@dont-email.me> <v6icsb$18bnm$1@dont-email.me> <v6ivke$1b3ak$1@dont-email.me> <iufq8jhjsia1qdm4pt2vgrovkhrpt8nj8u@4ax.com> <v6mfov$20818$3@dont-email.me> <6tht8j9kcaomraffha67s0ih4qeesl8hj6@4ax.com> <v6n40v$20818$7@dont-email.me> <rf9u8jh9anq08pcgr3ommovhtp2para8h8@4ax.com> <v6o1r7$2blhc$5@dont-email.me> <v6rnj6$344nh$1@dont-email.me> <9ep29jh7cmm9mh1c2fl0kbodtcu82siria@4ax.com> <v6sv7d$3e2fd$5@dont-email.me> <v6u9sj$3lm73$1@dont-email.me> <v6vi9o$3vr4c$2@dont-email.me> <v703uf$2hni$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 12:31:28 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1379ac5737e1afe87bf41eb3f217bbc2"; logging-data="120676"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+OENLJ9p7e7z9ep3hhFX26pnZ+l/a4WwM=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:3Hbv36Y1n/3HqHLy75cXM2KAuVs= In-Reply-To: <v703uf$2hni$2@dont-email.me> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 240714-4, 14/7/2024), Outbound message Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 5599 On 14/07/2024 6:57 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote: > On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 13:56:40 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote: > >> On 14/07/2024 2:26 am, Cursitor Doom wrote: >>> On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 14:18:40 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote: >>> >>>> On 13/07/2024 3:21 am, john larkin wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:02:30 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom >>>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 17:32:47 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On 11/07/2024 10:32 am, john larkin wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 23:04:00 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom >>>>>>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 10:48:09 -0700, john larkin wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:18:23 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom >>>>>>>>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 06:52:49 -0700, john larkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 09:24:30 -0000 (UTC), RJH >>>>>>>>>>>> <patchmoney@gmx.com> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9 Jul 2024 at 05:04:24 BST, Bill Sloman wrote: >> >> <snip> >> >>>>> CO2 is not pollution. It is plant food that keeps us alive. More >>>>> would be great. >>>> >>>> CO2 does serve as plant food, along with water, sun light and a bunch >>>> of minerals. Give plants more CO2 and they have fewer stomata in their >>>> leaves, so that they can get the same amount of CO2 while losing less >>>> water. >>>> >>>> It's also a greenhouse gas, and more of it generates global warming, >>>> which isn't great. Calling it pollution is odd, but more of it does >>>> cause problems. >>> >>> There are *no* "greenhouse gases" in our atmosphere, you damn fool. >> >> Not a widely shared delusion. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas >> >> list five major greenhouse gases, with water vapour responsible for half >> the warming. Joseph Fourier first worked out that the earth's surface >> was warmer than it should be back in 1824, and the greenhouse gases >> turned out to be the explanation. > > ??? That's glibness in the extreme even by your standards, Bill! Meaning of glibness in English "the quality of being confident, but too simple and lacking in careful thought : The author's writing has a glibness that sometimes passes as wit". It's difficult to avoid being glib when faced with such a brain-dead assertion. It would certainly have been a waste of time to ofer a more elborate explanation to a dim clown like you. >> You choose to deny this, mainly because you are a gullible sucker for >> climate change denial propaganda, but it's the sort of wilful ignorance >> that flat-earthers go in for, and not to be taken seriously. >> >>> Granted there are on other planets in our solar system, but not Earth. >>> So, >>> which planet are *you* on with your greenhouse gases, Bill? It clearly >>> isn't this one. >> >> It may be clear to you, but your idea of "clarity" looks like terminal >> confusion to anybody with working brain. > > Anyone with a working brain only needs to spend an hour - at most - in any > decent reference library to discover for themselves that the whole AGW > agenda is a SCAM. A rather curious definition of a "working brain". Mastering the science behind the anthropogenic global warming question would take even a scientifically sophisticated reader (and you aren't that) rather more than an hour. Realising that you didn't have a clue about what was being said might be managed in a hour, and you could throw in the ill-informed conclusion that it was a scam in even less time, but you'd be wrong - as you happen to be , which is evidence that you have a non-working brain, fit only for posturing and pontificating. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney -- This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software. www.norton.com