Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v709e0$3lr4$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,uk.d-i-y
Subject: Re: OT: EV Charging Stations Stripped of Copper Cables
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 20:31:27 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 95
Message-ID: <v709e0$3lr4$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v64kvk$2cc3j$2@dont-email.me> <v6ffko$ii8v$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6hfnm$10h93$2@dont-email.me> <v6icsb$18bnm$1@dont-email.me>
 <v6ivke$1b3ak$1@dont-email.me> <iufq8jhjsia1qdm4pt2vgrovkhrpt8nj8u@4ax.com>
 <v6mfov$20818$3@dont-email.me> <6tht8j9kcaomraffha67s0ih4qeesl8hj6@4ax.com>
 <v6n40v$20818$7@dont-email.me> <rf9u8jh9anq08pcgr3ommovhtp2para8h8@4ax.com>
 <v6o1r7$2blhc$5@dont-email.me> <v6rnj6$344nh$1@dont-email.me>
 <9ep29jh7cmm9mh1c2fl0kbodtcu82siria@4ax.com> <v6sv7d$3e2fd$5@dont-email.me>
 <v6u9sj$3lm73$1@dont-email.me> <v6vi9o$3vr4c$2@dont-email.me>
 <v703uf$2hni$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 12:31:28 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1379ac5737e1afe87bf41eb3f217bbc2";
	logging-data="120676"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+OENLJ9p7e7z9ep3hhFX26pnZ+l/a4WwM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3Hbv36Y1n/3HqHLy75cXM2KAuVs=
In-Reply-To: <v703uf$2hni$2@dont-email.me>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 240714-4, 14/7/2024), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 5599

On 14/07/2024 6:57 pm, Cursitor Doom wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 13:56:40 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
> 
>> On 14/07/2024 2:26 am, Cursitor Doom wrote:
>>> On Sat, 13 Jul 2024 14:18:40 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 13/07/2024 3:21 am, john larkin wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:02:30 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
>>>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 17:32:47 +1000, Bill Sloman wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/07/2024 10:32 am, john larkin wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 23:04:00 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
>>>>>>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 10:48:09 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:18:23 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
>>>>>>>>>> <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 06:52:49 -0700, john larkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 9 Jul 2024 09:24:30 -0000 (UTC), RJH
>>>>>>>>>>>> <patchmoney@gmx.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 9 Jul 2024 at 05:04:24 BST, Bill Sloman wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>>>> CO2 is not pollution. It is plant food that keeps us alive. More
>>>>> would be great.
>>>>
>>>> CO2 does serve as plant food, along with water, sun light and a bunch
>>>> of minerals. Give plants more CO2 and they have fewer stomata in their
>>>> leaves, so that they can get the same amount of CO2 while losing less
>>>> water.
>>>>
>>>> It's also a greenhouse gas, and more of it generates global warming,
>>>> which isn't great. Calling it pollution is odd, but more of it does
>>>> cause problems.
>>>
>>> There are *no* "greenhouse gases" in our atmosphere, you damn fool.
>>
>> Not a widely shared delusion.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenhouse_gas
>>
>> list five major greenhouse gases, with water vapour responsible for half
>> the warming. Joseph Fourier first worked out that the earth's surface
>> was warmer than it should be back in 1824, and the greenhouse gases
>> turned out to be the explanation.
> 
> ??? That's glibness in the extreme even by your standards, Bill!

Meaning of glibness in English "the quality of being confident, but too 
simple and lacking in careful thought : The author's writing has a 
glibness that sometimes passes as wit".

It's difficult to avoid being glib when faced with such a brain-dead 
assertion. It would certainly have been a waste of time to ofer a more 
elborate explanation to a dim clown like you.

>> You choose to deny this, mainly because you are a gullible sucker for
>> climate change denial propaganda, but it's the sort of wilful ignorance
>> that flat-earthers go in for, and not to be taken seriously.
>>
>>> Granted there are on other planets in our solar system, but not Earth.
>>> So,
>>> which planet are *you* on with your greenhouse gases, Bill? It clearly
>>> isn't this one.
>>
>> It may be clear to you, but your idea of "clarity" looks like terminal
>> confusion to anybody with working brain.
> 
> Anyone with a working brain only needs to spend an hour - at most - in any
> decent reference library to discover for themselves that the whole AGW
> agenda is a SCAM.

A rather curious definition of a "working brain". Mastering the science 
behind the anthropogenic global warming question would take even a 
scientifically sophisticated reader (and you aren't that) rather more 
than an hour. Realising that you didn't have a clue about what was being 
said might be managed in a hour, and you could throw in the ill-informed 
conclusion that it was a scam in even less time, but you'd be wrong - as 
you happen to be , which is evidence that you have a non-working brain, 
fit only for posturing and pontificating.

-- 
Bill Sloman, Sydney

-- 
This email has been checked for viruses by Norton antivirus software.
www.norton.com