Article <v70qpr$6n41$2@dont-email.me>

Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v70qpr$6n41$2@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano

<v70qpr$6n41$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Moebius <invalid@example.invalid>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Does the number of nines increase?
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 17:27:55 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <v70qpr$6n41$2@dont-email.me>
References: <tJf9P9dALSN4l2XH5vdqPbXSA7o@jntp>
 <74434c50-c747-4bce-853d-b7f8a9d0ef50@att.net>
 <-8_ECzK8niPUPiyxStcpsZWzJqA@jntp>
 <53214031-3ad1-48bd-8584-0720ec5b28dd@att.net>
 <bsFBaEx89RCdvkhqBwd1K4mh5ns@jntp>
 <d98d5c8a-041d-4ce6-b7c8-5a212a7bfa3c@att.net>
 <e3ZDe1OozyaPv_8HZy_kTDZtHJk@jntp> <v6spao$3diun$2@dont-email.me>
 <d6yZRpOl38J4dqE-n_qqzplqNmQ@jntp> <v6ul15$3ni5h$1@dont-email.me>
 <79JoZp5bHCH4hf4J9cxbLGeMvPE@jntp> <v70pd4$6n41$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: invalid@example.invalid
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 17:27:55 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0a5d97bddf123017cd96c0ab21fd97b4";
	logging-data="220289"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/FzuIP36UQq4JMa88nwd0J"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9/KdsmrGz8sipe1lcJbZCPJyq7k=
In-Reply-To: <v70pd4$6n41$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: de-DE
Bytes: 2289

Am 14.07.2024 um 17:04 schrieb Moebius:
> Am 14.07.2024 um 14:58 schrieb WM:
>> Le 13/07/2024 à 21:37, Moebius a écrit :
>>> Am 13.07.2024 um 17:56 schrieb WM:
>>>> Le 13/07/2024 à 04:38, Moebius a écrit :
>>>>> Am 12.07.2024 um 19:29 schrieb WM:
>>>>>  > Le 10/07/2024 à 19:58, Jim Burns a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>>  >> When you say that
>>>>>  >> NUF(x) doesn't changeᵂᴹ at 0
>>>>>  >> you mean that
>>>>>  >
>>>>>  > it does not change its value from x < 0, namely NUF(0) = 0.
>>>>>
>>>>> But it changes its value from aleph_0 for each and every x > 0 to 0 
>>>>> at x = 0,
>>>>
>>>> That claim is wrong, 
>>>
>>> Nope. 
>>
>> That claim is wrong,
> 
> Nope.

Hinweis:

For each and every x e IR, x > 0: NUF(x) = aleph_0
and for each and every x e IR, x <= 0: NUF(x) = 0.

That's a change, isn't it?