Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Who here understands that the last paragraph is Necessarily true?
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 18:57:08 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 74
Message-ID: <v71okl$bvm2$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v6un9t$3nufp$1@dont-email.me> <v7013v$2ccv$1@dont-email.me>
 <v70nt7$61d8$6@dont-email.me>
 <58fc6559638120b31e128fe97b5e955248afe218@i2pn2.org>
 <v71mjh$bp3i$1@dont-email.me>
 <1173a460ee95e0ca82c08abecdefc80ba86646ac@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 01:57:09 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="13997779445f04dacae82f025877e637";
	logging-data="392898"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/JUhwgv7KtKHbd4Jx1ffZk"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VnGDRo8hSQO2NCm4Lu6YmYeh1bM=
In-Reply-To: <1173a460ee95e0ca82c08abecdefc80ba86646ac@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3157

On 7/14/2024 6:46 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 7/14/24 7:22 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 7/14/2024 4:41 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 7/14/24 10:38 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 7/14/2024 3:09 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-07-13 20:15:56 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> typedef void (*ptr)();
>>>>>> int HHH(ptr P);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> void Infinite_Loop()
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>    HERE: goto HERE;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> void Infinite_Recursion()
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>    Infinite_Recursion();
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> void DDD()
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>    HHH(DDD);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> int main()
>>>>>> {
>>>>>>    HHH(Infinite_Loop);
>>>>>>    HHH(Infinite_Recursion);
>>>>>>    HHH(DDD);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any input that must be aborted to prevent the non
>>>>>> termination of HHH necessarily specifies non-halting
>>>>>> behavior or it would never need to be aborted.
>>>>>
>>>>> Everyone understands that DDD specifies a halting behaviour if 
>>>>> HHH(DDD) does,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *You can comprehend this is a truism or fail to*
>>>> *comprehend it disagreement is necessarily incorrect*
>>>> Any input that must be aborted to prevent the non
>>>> termination of HHH necessarily specifies non-halting
>>>> behavior or it would never need to be aborted.
>>>>
>>>> Disagreeing with the above is analogous to disagreeing
>>>> with arithmetic.
>>>>
>>>
>>> But if HHH does abort 
>>
>> int x = 5;
>> int y = 3;
>> if (x > y) // *before abort*
>> {
>>    printf("x > y is necessarily true\n");
>>    y = 2 * x;  // *after abort*
>> }
>>
>>
>>
> 
> Red Hering, showin your utter stupidity.
> 

In other words giving up on you was the correct thing
to do. You have proven to be incorrigible when you
consistently deny tautologies.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer