Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Who here understands that the last paragraph is Necessarily true?
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2024 20:27:07 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 88
Message-ID: <v71ttb$crk4$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v6un9t$3nufp$1@dont-email.me> <v7013v$2ccv$1@dont-email.me>
 <v70nt7$61d8$6@dont-email.me>
 <58fc6559638120b31e128fe97b5e955248afe218@i2pn2.org>
 <v71mjh$bp3i$1@dont-email.me>
 <1173a460ee95e0ca82c08abecdefc80ba86646ac@i2pn2.org>
 <v71okl$bvm2$1@dont-email.me>
 <5f6daf68f1b4ffac854d239282bc811b5b806659@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 03:27:08 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="13997779445f04dacae82f025877e637";
	logging-data="421508"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/NHvO934qpWam2pAUmC0/C"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qDAbj6CeZohuaugtg7C5KcNWYRc=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <5f6daf68f1b4ffac854d239282bc811b5b806659@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 3789

On 7/14/2024 7:30 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 7/14/24 7:57 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 7/14/2024 6:46 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 7/14/24 7:22 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 7/14/2024 4:41 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 7/14/24 10:38 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/14/2024 3:09 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-07-13 20:15:56 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> typedef void (*ptr)();
>>>>>>>> int HHH(ptr P);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> void Infinite_Loop()
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>    HERE: goto HERE;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> void Infinite_Recursion()
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>    Infinite_Recursion();
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> void DDD()
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>    HHH(DDD);
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> int main()
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>    HHH(Infinite_Loop);
>>>>>>>>    HHH(Infinite_Recursion);
>>>>>>>>    HHH(DDD);
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any input that must be aborted to prevent the non
>>>>>>>> termination of HHH necessarily specifies non-halting
>>>>>>>> behavior or it would never need to be aborted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Everyone understands that DDD specifies a halting behaviour if 
>>>>>>> HHH(DDD) does,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *You can comprehend this is a truism or fail to*
>>>>>> *comprehend it disagreement is necessarily incorrect*
>>>>>> Any input that must be aborted to prevent the non
>>>>>> termination of HHH necessarily specifies non-halting
>>>>>> behavior or it would never need to be aborted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Disagreeing with the above is analogous to disagreeing
>>>>>> with arithmetic.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But if HHH does abort 
>>>>
>>>> int x = 5;
>>>> int y = 3;
>>>> if (x > y) // *before abort*
>>>> {
>>>>    printf("x > y is necessarily true\n");
>>>>    y = 2 * x;  // *after abort*
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Red Hering, showin your utter stupidity.
>>>
>>
>> In other words giving up on you was the correct thing
>> to do. You have proven to be incorrigible when you
>> consistently deny tautologies.
>>
> 
> No, you dont have tautologies, 

Any input that must be aborted to prevent the non termination
of simulating termination analyzer HHH necessarily specifies
non-halting behavior or it would never need to be aborted.

> but LIE based on changing the meaning of words.
> 

That is what you have been doing.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer