Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
Subject: Re: OT: Hunter Biden Laptop
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 10:45:49 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 97
Message-ID: <v73n8d$ocpk$4@dont-email.me>
References: <v5nb48$3harb$1@dont-email.me> <v5nbpo$3hedu$2@dont-email.me>
 <v5uma8$15cvg$2@dont-email.me> <v5us8g$16fan$1@dont-email.me>
 <v69eat$3cp2n$3@dont-email.me> <v69j08$3dqr1$3@dont-email.me>
 <v6m6ce$1ur0u$1@dont-email.me> <v6mg2t$20ff2$2@dont-email.me>
 <v73mh2$pnga$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 19:45:50 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="da06c33a0e24710f2409bdb56f35c7df";
	logging-data="799540"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1887AGwQ/vQlsA8hx6QwWLZNOsd7Z+4pjM="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Td+8zjhOBcWo2AbZ3E4POWbNiBg=
In-Reply-To: <v73mh2$pnga$3@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-CA
Bytes: 4688

On 2024-07-15 10:33, Tom Elam wrote:
> On 7/10/2024 1:23 PM, Alan wrote:
>> On 2024-07-10 07:38, Tom Elam wrote:
>>> On 7/5/2024 3:53 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>> On 2024-07-05 11:34, Tom Elam wrote:
>>>>> On 7/1/2024 2:24 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-07-01 09:42, Tom Elam wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/28/2024 6:00 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2024-06-28 14:48, Tom Elam wrote:
>>>>>>>>> IIRC Liarboy Baker over in a different group some time back 
>>>>>>>>> disputed the authenticity of said laptop. That based on 
>>>>>>>>> conjecture and his political bias.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Really? What did I actually say, Liarboy?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Now, the FBI has examined the laptop and it has been admitted 
>>>>>>>>> into evidence in H. Biden's tax evasion case.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hmmm, typical Baker.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTW, in my personal opinion why can't we find better candidates 
>>>>>>>>> for the U.S. presidency? Is this REALLY the best we can do???? 
>>>>>>>>> Sad.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But you'll vote for the convicted felon who tried to overturn 
>>>>>>>> the results of the 2020 election...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...and took hundreds upon hundreds of classified documents with 
>>>>>>>> him...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...lied about having them...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...moved them around to support his lie...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...and tried to erase the video evidence of this.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Won't you?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All of that is based on what I said a long time ago. Your 
>>>>>>> comments are based on events since then. Of course Biden also 
>>>>>>> took hundreds of such documents too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is it the same?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did he do so deliberately?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did he refuse to return them?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Was a search warrant necessary to get Biden to return them...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...or did he open his doors and let people check for them?
>>>>>
>>>>> To quote the report on Biden's document discovery:
>>>>>
>>>>> "In a 388-page report, the special counsel also dwelled on Biden’s 
>>>>> lapses in memory, writing that "Mr. Biden would likely present 
>>>>> himself to a jury, as he did during our interview of him, as a 
>>>>> sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory."
>>>>>
>>>>> You are correct, their behavior was different. :)
>>>>>
>>>>> We will see how the Trump trial turns out. He may also be found not 
>>>>> guilty.
>>>>
>>>> Why didn't you answer a single one of my questions, Liarboy?
>>>>
>>>> Were you too afraid?
>>>>
>>>> Did Biden deliberately take those documents?
>>>>
>>>> Did he refuse to return any of them?
>>>>
>>>> Was a search warrant made necessary by Biden's actions?
>>>>
>>>> What a little pussy you are.
>>>
>>> Biden kept the papers. If it was not intentional that's more senility 
>>> evidence. Had he asked for a search warrant it would have looked even 
>>> worse.
>>>
>>
>> Did you answer my questions?
>>
>> No.
>>
>> And people don't "ask for search warrants", Liarboy?
>>
>> Search warrants are obtained when there is evidence of wrong doing AND 
>> the person or persons suspected refuse to allow a search.
> 
> Wrong again Liarboy. If law enforcement shows up and wants to search my 
> home I can ASK for a search warrant. There is no end to your lies and 
> ignorance is there?

You ASK to SEE a search warrant or you can REFUSE the search.