Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v74ejo$tr01$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: Does the number of nines increase? Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 17:24:23 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 34 Message-ID: <v74ejo$tr01$1@dont-email.me> References: <tJf9P9dALSN4l2XH5vdqPbXSA7o@jntp> <53214031-3ad1-48bd-8584-0720ec5b28dd@att.net> <bsFBaEx89RCdvkhqBwd1K4mh5ns@jntp> <d98d5c8a-041d-4ce6-b7c8-5a212a7bfa3c@att.net> <e3ZDe1OozyaPv_8HZy_kTDZtHJk@jntp> <v6spao$3diun$2@dont-email.me> <d6yZRpOl38J4dqE-n_qqzplqNmQ@jntp> <v6ul15$3ni5h$1@dont-email.me> <79JoZp5bHCH4hf4J9cxbLGeMvPE@jntp> <v70pd4$6n41$1@dont-email.me> <vv6K_9idTUEwX3W3ECn0Z9xK6Uk@jntp> <74edd85cf4bdd0aecaee742ef35763e9d9dc8741@i2pn2.org> <v745vl$skrg$1@dont-email.me> <v746qj$t0g9$1@dont-email.me> <v74d0v$u43b$1@dont-email.me> <v74dn3$u43c$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 02:24:24 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="450a0e1462802decfe06d2fadc7d9026"; logging-data="977921"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Q2TUbmLiabUEDRdjPzOLFN/GfKBsNtbk=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:rvP1Spj+382hAtGoJ9HH/mqTzBo= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <v74dn3$u43c$1@dont-email.me> Bytes: 2906 On 7/15/2024 5:09 PM, Moebius wrote: > Am 16.07.2024 um 01:57 schrieb Moebius: > > > Siehe auch: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantifier_shift > > Hier wird als ein Beispiel fΓΌr diesen Fehlschluss angefΓΌhrt: > > 3. Every natural number π has a successor π = π + 1, the smallest of all > natural numbers that are greater than π. Therefore, there is a natural > number π that is a successor to all natural numbers. > > Β Β Β βπ βπ πππ β’ βπ βπ πππ. > > It is fallacious to conclude that there is a single natural number that > is the successor of every natural number. There are infinite successors to any finite number? Say, 5: 5, 5 + 1, 5 + 2, 5 + 3, 5 + 4, ... 5 + 1 is a successor to 5? Fair enough? > > FΓΌr MΓΌckenheim ist es nun aber so, dass wegen seiner "Gleichsetzung" von > βπ βπ πππ mit βπ βπ πππ eben βπ βπ πππ βπ βπ πππ "impliziert" (besser > gleichbedeutend ist mit βπ βπ πππ). > > Im MΓΌckenland gibt es daher eine natΓΌrliche Zahl, die "Successor" jeder > natΓΌrlichen Zahl ist (also auch von sich selbst); d a s ist die grΓΆΓte > natΓΌrliche Zahl!