Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v74h95$un01$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Continuations Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 01:09:58 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 18 Message-ID: <v74h95$un01$6@dont-email.me> References: <v6tbki$3g9rg$1@dont-email.me> <v71jfh$jko$1@gal.iecc.com> <lfldplF1kmoU1@mid.individual.net> <v74cn9$tuk4$2@dont-email.me> <v74cug$t8j$2@gal.iecc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 03:09:58 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="55f74b4ae2f116c131f41dc172ef4daf"; logging-data="1006593"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19X57h16g7OigN+6G6PRSGh" User-Agent: Pan/0.158 (Avdiivka; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:DUqepqhMbBzYxYMLU9J/2v/LUOA= Bytes: 1805 On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 23:56:00 -0000 (UTC), John Levine wrote: > According to Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>: >>On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 23:06:13 +0300, Niklas Holsti wrote: >> >>> IMO, for something to qualify as a continuation-passing call, the >>> caller should select the callee -- the thing to be executed next -- >>> but in SAGE/SABRE it is the scheduler that selects what to execute >>> next. >> >> What you have is that SAGE/SABRE has built a higher-level scheduler >> abstraction on top of lower-level coroutines/continuations. > > It was an event loop, not coroutines. The one does not preclude the other. So they lacked the coroutine abstraction; that could have been added easily enough in the application implementation language.