Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v74kdq$1thc$1@gal.iecc.com>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v74kdq$1thc$1@gal.iecc.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!not-for-mail
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Continuations
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 02:03:38 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Taughannock Networks
Message-ID: <v74kdq$1thc$1@gal.iecc.com>
References: <v6tbki$3g9rg$1@dont-email.me> <v74cn9$tuk4$2@dont-email.me> <v74cug$t8j$2@gal.iecc.com> <v74h95$un01$6@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 02:03:38 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970";
	logging-data="63020"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
In-Reply-To: <v6tbki$3g9rg$1@dont-email.me> <v74cn9$tuk4$2@dont-email.me> <v74cug$t8j$2@gal.iecc.com> <v74h95$un01$6@dont-email.me>
Cleverness: some
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Originator: johnl@iecc.com (John Levine)
Bytes: 2168
Lines: 27

According to Lawrence D'Oliveiro  <ldo@nz.invalid>:
>On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 23:56:00 -0000 (UTC), John Levine wrote:
>
>> According to Lawrence D'Oliveiro  <ldo@nz.invalid>:
>>>On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 23:06:13 +0300, Niklas Holsti wrote:
>>>
>>>> IMO, for something to qualify as a continuation-passing call, the
>>>> caller should select the callee -- the thing to be executed next --
>>>> but in SAGE/SABRE it is the scheduler that selects what to execute
>>>> next.
>>>
>>> What you have is that SAGE/SABRE has built a higher-level scheduler
>>> abstraction on top of lower-level coroutines/continuations.
>> 
>> It was an event loop, not coroutines.
>
>The one does not preclude the other. So they lacked the coroutine 
>abstraction; that could have been added easily enough in the application 
>implementation language.

Just for amusement, what do you think the application implementation
languages for SAGE and SABRE were? For that matter, what computers do
you think they ran on?

-- 
Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly