Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: Judge Cannon dismisses Trump classifeid documents case
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 21:54:27 -0700
Message-ID: <v74ue2$n57i$1@solani.org>
References: <anea9j1u6eqqbin0a970pi8hht7qmvd1al@4ax.com>
 <kRSdnfkFoqcAxQj7nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>
 <YcCdnQjvpZTMCAj7nZ2dnZfqn_EAAAAA@giganews.com>
 <atropos-636C87.14385015072024@news.giganews.com>
 <ev6b9jto5nsi6e65i6rk9abnrq764b52on@4ax.com>
 <atropos-F11465.19320215072024@news.giganews.com>
 <v74r2r$13ukq$1@dont-email.me>
 <atropos-5A50B6.21092715072024@news.giganews.com>
 <ssub9jh6rsgpajqdo59n5285b2611kj6om@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 04:54:26 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="759026"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.2.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RK67Zxdz6UCIjxA3yesHl/fsk94=
X-User-ID: eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BLhSY8cgoM/xJ2x2ti7TAauNyNO+c5yFPkN6JwKKeLWZ59XndUhMdAUvMHFHcQsQ==
In-Reply-To: <ssub9jh6rsgpajqdo59n5285b2611kj6om@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US

On 7/15/2024 9:50 PM, shawn wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 21:09:27 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
> 
>> In article <v74r2r$13ukq$1@dont-email.me>,
>> moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/15/2024 10:32 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <ev6b9jto5nsi6e65i6rk9abnrq764b52on@4ax.com>,
>>>>    shawn <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 14:38:50 -0700, BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article <YcCdnQjvpZTMCAj7nZ2dnZfqn_EAAAAA@giganews.com>,
>>>>>> Ubiquitous <weberm@polaris.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> atropos@mac.com wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And this was the only one of the prosecutions that had any actual
>>>>>>>> legitimacy, too.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, it didn't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, it did. Both Trump and Biden violated the law by absconding with
>>>>>> classified documents. Biden even shared them with the writer who
>>>>>> ghost-wrote his book, someone who had no clearance at all, let alone
>>>>>> the TS-SCI clearance necessary to receive that information.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They should both be held accountable, but the DOJ let Biden off the
>>>>>> hook by declaring him an unprosecutable vegetable. So as long as
>>>>>> Biden is going to skate, it's only fitting that Trump does so as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's not what was said but that isn't important. What is important
>>>>> is Biden returned the documents he had of his own accord. Trump, on
>>>>> the other hand, went out of his way to keep the documents he had to
>>>>> the point of lying whether he had any documents when asked multiple
>>>>> times if he had any and given the chance to return them. If he had
>>>>> returned the documents he had when asked none of this would have
>>>>> happened. Instead he lied and tried to hide the documents he had taken
>>>>> to the point that the FBI had to come and get the documents.
>>>>
>>>> Then they should have charged him with lying to the FBI-- that's what
>>>> they got Martha Stewart on-- but they didn't. They charged him with
>>>> illegally possessing the documents, something of which both Biden and
>>>> Trump are guilty. If one gets off, the other should, too.
>>>
>>> One cooperated and one didn't ...which I'm told makes a difference.
>>
>> Maybe in other cases, but in this one, what apparently made the
>> difference is that Biden is a dementia-addled mess.
> 
> Or that if he was charged and put on trial his age would make it hard
> to convict him. Dementia-addled mess is something that you keep saying
> but it isn't what was said as why they didn't charge him.
> 
Yep Biden turned over the documents without a subpoena, and Trump didn't