Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v755lp$15kdl$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad Subject: Re: Every iPhone below the 15 fails the EU longevity test Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 06:58:01 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 23 Message-ID: <v755lp$15kdl$1@dont-email.me> References: <v6uh3r$3tm$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <v6uipg$3h6l0$2@dont-email.me> <v73gc9$ojuh$1@dont-email.me> <v74bsm$19pi$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:58:02 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="adf15efcee042b40cf83cb84225615d9"; logging-data="1233333"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/9LYkPwLrdljfnGlXrs5aC2qBgDVepzdo=" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:VG1ziBPrmvLqDazUVV7I0YC0pqQ= sha1:lawiV6HGQIKFtnuI9sYjXRewWxM= Bytes: 2124 Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote: > Chris wrote on Mon, 15 Jul 2024 16:48:24 +0100 : > >> There isn't one. > > <https://energy-efficient-products.ec.europa.eu/ecodesign-and-energy-label/product-list/smartphones-and-tablets_en> > "Ecodesign requirements will apply to mobile phones and tablets > put on the EU market from 20 June 2025 onwards, including: > ... > sufficiently durable batteries which can withstand > at least 800 charge and discharge cycles > while retaining at least 80% of their initial capacity > ... Thanks for sharing the link for the first time despite ranting about this for the best part of three days. Now point to where the regulation confirms the subject of this thread i.e. "every iphone <15 fails the EU [battery] longevity test". Note the key word "fails". Apple (or any other manufacturer) choosing to omit legacy models from new regulations is not equivalent to failing to meet the regulations.