Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 21:31:34 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <v76hh2$1d5jc$2@dont-email.me>
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <v71c86$a0te$1@dont-email.me>
 <fCidXYmBeggYm31OO1-5v64V0S8@jntp> <v736bn$mo0c$1@dont-email.me>
 <yX3K1wOobcIp1KzCuRuRL0Htcvg@jntp> <v73otr$ptku$1@dont-email.me>
 <cGLopKEv1S9qR2nNCvaF8IqKf-s@jntp> <v75m18$1828i$2@dont-email.me>
 <esHcGgnWa-kSH-yFGrczTDSFLzc@jntp> <v76e49$1cn1q$1@dont-email.me>
 <xLBGlqr9FmVi45Mlcw6nJbdFqqM@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 21:26:26 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8154274a8b4f9e673e1f6a21fcfb5fc6";
	logging-data="1480300"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+krknGxCydxGtAaUdKbasD"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:QZg/Toy9plmNCyDvdtiKYbxiksY=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <xLBGlqr9FmVi45Mlcw6nJbdFqqM@jntp>
Bytes: 2516

Den 16.07.2024 20:56, skrev Richard Hachel:
> Le 16/07/2024 à 20:28, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
>>
>> Den 16.07.2024 15:25, skrev Richard Hachel:
>>> . .
>>> They will still be if we ask Terrence's own time between the two crossings.
>>> Tr=To.sqrt(1-Vo²/c²)=24/9 years (or 8/3)
>>> . .
>>> Hence Tr=24/9 years for her too (or 8/3).
>>> . .
>>> 

>> So your theory predicts that Stella and Terrence ages equally.
>>
>> According to SR Stella's proper time is τₛ ≈ 2.19722 years.
>>
>> So "the travelling twin" ages less than the "stay at home twin".
>>
>> The ageing of the twins in the "twin paradox" is experimentally 
>> verified to be as predicted by SR.
>>
>> Your theory is falsified.
> 
> This is what I keep repeating to relativistic physicists, who can read 
> what I write on usenet (but I don't think they are interested).

Right.
I am not interested.
You have answered my question and showed that the predictions
of your "theory" are different from the predictions of SR.

I am not interested in your obviously inconsistent
theory which give predictions which are not in accordance
with reality.

-- 
Paul

https://paulba.no/