Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v78epi$1pkt8$5@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Python <python@invalid.org>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Le_pi=C3=A8ge_parfait_=28the_perfect_trap=29?=
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 14:52:02 +0200
Organization: CCCP
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <v78epi$1pkt8$5@dont-email.me>
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <v71c86$a0te$1@dont-email.me>
 <fCidXYmBeggYm31OO1-5v64V0S8@jntp> <v736bn$mo0c$1@dont-email.me>
 <yX3K1wOobcIp1KzCuRuRL0Htcvg@jntp> <v73otr$ptku$1@dont-email.me>
 <ch2jfWaArdOfK3yzPPitxq9HA-A@jntp> <v75ner$1828i$3@dont-email.me>
 <Bd8mOA-8nINExuba8PnEg4CG9rI@jntp> <v76fvs$1d5jc$1@dont-email.me>
 <y2JkxT04PJ9pNpvNVb0oXaWVKOw@jntp> <v76i7r$1d5jc$3@dont-email.me>
 <lfp9aaFkr1mU2@mid.individual.net> <v78dem$1r5au$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 14:52:03 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="11923cb29fc9016b5182303cf2a03872";
	logging-data="1889192"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+Y1DZXheX7WMGrt2kwumj5"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:7XemMdT943aCswdyC8lBQIXMPZ8=
In-Reply-To: <v78dem$1r5au$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3352

Le 17/07/2024 à 14:34, Paul.B.Andersen a écrit :
> Den 17.07.2024 09:14, skrev Thomas Heger:
>> Am Dienstag000016, 16.07.2024 um 21:43 schrieb Paul.B.Andersen:
>>>
>>> There is but one Special Theory of Relativity.
>>
>> No, since actually Einstein's 'On the electrodynamics of moving 
>> bodies' is usually called SRT.
> 
> Of course. This IS the Special Theory of Relativity.
> 
>>
>> But there have been several other attempts to the same problem.
>>
>> One stems from Herman Minkowski and one from Herny Poincaré.
> 
> Minkowski introduced spacetime and the geometric approach
> with metric and proper time.
> It is a reformulation of Einstein's theory, but it is
> still The Special Theory of Relativity.
> 
> Einstein adopted this view, and the very first equation
> in Einstein's "The Foundation of General Relativity"
> is the metric for the Special Theory of Relativity.
> 
> https://paulba.no/paper/Foundation_of_GR.pdf
> § 4 equation (1)
> 
>>
>> Also the present mainstream consensus about this subject can be called 
>> 'SRT', but is different to what Einstein wrote.
> 
> It is still the same one and only Special Theory of Relativity,
> even if the math has evolved since 1905.
> But there is nothing you can calculate from the metric,
> which you can't calculate from the Lorentz transform in
> "On the electrodynamics of moving bodies".
> 
>>
>> There are also a number of other versions, which were created by 
>> people of minor importance, like e.g. also people participating in 
>> this forum.
>>
>> What exactly 'SRT' is, that is not cast in stone, but is a subject you 
>> could debate.
>> ...
> 
> The Special Theory of Relativity is precisely defined,
> and there is no debate of what it is.
> (Among reasonable knowledgeable people.)
> 

Both Thomas and Richard are insanely demented. But at least Thomas
is not allowed to practice medicine.