Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<v78vi6$1ujli$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Antonio Marques <no_email@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.lang Subject: Re: Official German spelling update Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 17:38:15 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 12 Message-ID: <v78vi6$1ujli$1@dont-email.me> References: <slrnv8raos.7eh.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <slrnv95gaj.17f0.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <87o77158s5.fsf@parhasard.net> <slrnv960kk.1ch5.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <v70abv$40o6$1@dont-email.me> <Vielen-20240714122028@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <pp789jppco8vfh98d2ik8tkddta7q108es@4ax.com> <v73nfh$q2r6$1@dont-email.me> <Vielen-20240715201141@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <vielen-20240715204349@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <esoc9jlf86ardum3ut1er7g9hrs07amdr1@4ax.com> <v7636u$1aoug$1@dont-email.me> <viel-20240716164311@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <viel-20240716183056@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 19:38:15 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5e9412481aadb0694c1f868239450271"; logging-data="2051762"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+1oQ8KTKO+qPMubLyH8jvFUaWvhuxd1g/TwyzKAG3SVw==" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Nx1oYAORmqVrNtdoT2BZhwsWY3E= sha1:FUWfELW6zOCtRjBW6dbC7cakgfA= Bytes: 2050 Stefan Ram <ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) wrote or quoted: >> |"viel" (or the Middle High German vil) was originally used as >> |a noun that entailed a partitive genitive. As you can see > > The omission of the partitive is akin a bit to when the "of" > is dropped in "a couple friends." Compare that also to German: > "eine Art von Zahlwort" -> "eine Art Zahlwort". > Can one still say 'viel Danks/Glücks', or would that be wrong outright?