Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: From the Archives .....
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 19:03:50 +1000
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <v7alpm$2bfc8$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v75lh5$18ca5$1@dont-email.me> <xn0ooe4vhk07kkt002@post.eweka.nl>
 <v77qp0$1nu9n$1@dont-email.me> <v77uob$1oiot$1@dont-email.me>
 <v78dr2$1ii6$10@gallifrey.nk.ca> <xn0oofl0p11q32001@post.eweka.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 11:03:50 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="56ed8ca3256136d75d858bac532b9aac";
	logging-data="2473352"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195MVC62I1109h11RI/GJHbQIXMsEFnxgM="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101
 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:l57iwRAyi1FhKkYfLSH4Jwf8S4k=
In-Reply-To: <xn0oofl0p11q32001@post.eweka.nl>
Bytes: 2644

Blueshirt wrote on 18/7/24 3:01 am:
> The Doctor wrote:
>> In article <v77uob$1oiot$1@dont-email.me>,
>> solar penguin  <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>> Blueshirt wrote on 17/07/2024 2:01 am:
>>>>> The Doctor wrote:
>>>>>> In article <xn0oodysdjrz7fu004@post.eweka.nl>,
>>>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The correct answer is that they were intended to be the
>>>>>>> faces of previous incarnations of the Doctor!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bogus there BS!
>>>>>
>>>>> No Dave, the sentence I typed is 100% factual. If you
>>>>> don't know that then clearly you don't know much about
>>>>> Doctor Who!
>>>>
>>>> Haven't we already established that Gobble-de-gook knows
>>>> bugger all about the "Doctor Who" T.V. Series??
>>>
>>> You could’ve ended that sentence at “all” and it would still
>>> be true.
>>
>> The Timeless Child never happened.
> 
> In your opinion... which is out of touch with the real world.
> (Nothing new there so!)
> 
> However, we we wasn't actually discussing the Timeless Child. So
> it's yet another example of you trying to derail a discussion
> that you are unable to partake properly in because of your lack
> of knowledge about Doctor Who.
> 
Hmm!! Could the term "One trick pony" apply to Gobble-de-gook??

Probably not, cause he would even have trouble handling that many tricks!!
-- 
Daniel