Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <v7bqlv$2ie0l$1@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<v7bqlv$2ie0l$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Paul.B.Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 21:38:32 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 77
Message-ID: <v7bqlv$2ie0l$1@dont-email.me>
References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <v73otr$ptku$1@dont-email.me>
 <cGLopKEv1S9qR2nNCvaF8IqKf-s@jntp> <v75m18$1828i$2@dont-email.me>
 <esHcGgnWa-kSH-yFGrczTDSFLzc@jntp> <v76e49$1cn1q$1@dont-email.me>
 <xLBGlqr9FmVi45Mlcw6nJbdFqqM@jntp> <v76hh2$1d5jc$2@dont-email.me>
 <MINhbylBZhXuFEEVBuuOVNQAhME@jntp> <v78vh4$1u5pb$2@dont-email.me>
 <KgsNxvPyqt-0B8k9AVRrfDcva1k@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 21:33:20 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c057c8c303ddc1c45b0a9752b0f77ad1";
	logging-data="2701333"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19R/42amXr/YroyWicmiO0g"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:yNj3/zjXfO5DGTUGCe5xG/12zb0=
In-Reply-To: <KgsNxvPyqt-0B8k9AVRrfDcva1k@jntp>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 3906

Den 17.07.2024 20:26, skrev Richard Hachel:
> Le 17/07/2024 à 19:37, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
>> Den 16.07.2024 21:35, skrev Richard Hachel:
>>> Le 16/07/2024 à 21:26, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
>>>> I am not interested in your obviously inconsistent
>>>> theory which give predictions which are not in accordance
>>>> with reality.
>>>
>>> You are right.
>>> A theory that does not agree with experimentation cannot be correct.
>>
>> So you finally got it!
>> 
>> Your theory predicts that the real speed of
>> the proton in the LHC is 6947c.
>> 
>> The real speed of protons is measured to be less than c.
>> 
>> Since the predicted speed is different from
>> the measured speed, your theory is falsified.
>> 
> 
> No. My theory predicts that the observable speed of 
> the proton will be Vo=0.9999998c

Your theory predicts that the real speed of the protons
in the LHC is 6947c.

The real speed of the protons in the LHC is measured
to be 0.9999998c.

Since the predicted speed is different from
the measured speed, your theory is falsified.

------------------------

BTW, have you forgotten that you have admitted to be
not in your right mind? :-D

Den 17.07.2024 19:34, skrev Richard Hachel:
 > Le 17/07/2024 à 19:24, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit :
 >>
 >> | Den 27.03.2024 07:23, skrev Richard Hachel:
 >> |> Le 26/03/2024 à 21:45, "Paul B. Andersen" a écrit :
 >> |>>
 >> |>> You are claiming that the protons are going around the ≈ 27 km ring
 >> |>> ≈ 78 million times per second.
 >> |>> The real value is ≈ 11.25 thousand times per second.
 >> |>
 >> |> CERN physicists are doing their job.
 >> |> We have accustomed them to working at classic relativistic speed.
 >> |> So it makes sense that they find the speed they expect.
 >> |> I tell them that the proton rotates 78 million times per second,
 >>
 >> You are saying that when the physicists who are operating the LHC
 >> know that a proton has gone around the circuit once, it has really
 >> gone around the circuit 78000000/11250 = 6933 times.
 >
 > No one in their right mind has ever said that.

But you, Richard Hachel, said that and are according to you
not in your right mind.

------------------

Please keep insisting that if the speed of the protons is 6947c
and thus will move once around the ring in ≈ 13 ns, then a clock
at a point in the ring will measure that the proton passes it
every ≈ 90 μs.

(I have a morbid sense of humour and love to rub it in.)

-- 
Paul, having fun

https://paulba.no/