Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Who here understands that the last paragraph is Necessarily true?
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 12:00:58 +0300
Organization: -
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <v7da0a$2ts8o$1@dont-email.me>
References: <v6un9t$3nufp$1@dont-email.me> <v7013v$2ccv$1@dont-email.me> <v70nt7$61d8$6@dont-email.me> <58fc6559638120b31e128fe97b5e955248afe218@i2pn2.org> <v71mjh$bp3i$1@dont-email.me> <1173a460ee95e0ca82c08abecdefc80ba86646ac@i2pn2.org> <v71okl$bvm2$1@dont-email.me> <5f6daf68f1b4ffac854d239282bc811b5b806659@i2pn2.org> <v71ttb$crk4$1@dont-email.me> <60e7a93cb8cec0afb68b3e40a0e82e9d63fa8e2a@i2pn2.org> <v725p4$hlvg$2@dont-email.me> <v72n49$kfho$1@dont-email.me> <v739gj$mjis$18@dont-email.me> <d8b0e6093be2a1874464d11a7c38720bac7917a8@i2pn2.org> <v742dl$s48s$1@dont-email.me> <v75agu$16efu$1@dont-email.me> <v76e2n$1cf96$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 11:00:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d8e6a880333ac9ba3ce5a2356e771ffe";
	logging-data="3076376"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ZdGnVlBCwUGumZsg+Zq2L"
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8JKIdWIyhZ+b8lt7+1N7D8Pyh74=
Bytes: 3800

On 2024-07-16 18:27:35 +0000, olcott said:

> On 7/16/2024 3:20 AM, Mikko wrote:
>> On 2024-07-15 20:56:21 +0000, olcott said:
>> 
>>> On 7/15/2024 3:51 PM, joes wrote:
>>>> Am Mon, 15 Jul 2024 08:51:14 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>>> On 7/15/2024 3:37 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>> On 2024-07-15 03:41:24 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>>> On 7/14/2024 9:04 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 7/14/24 9:27 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Any input that must be aborted to prevent the non termination of
>>>>>>>>> simulating termination analyzer HHH necessarily specifies
>>>>>>>>> non-halting behavior or it would never need to be aborted.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Excpet, as I have shown, it doesn't.
>>>>>>>> Your problem is you keep on ILEGALLY changing the input in your
>>>>>>>> argument because you have misdefined what the input is.
>>>>>>>> The input to HHH is ALL of the memory that it would be accessed in a
>>>>>>>> correct simulation of DDD, which includes all the codd of HHH, and
>>>>>>>> thus, if you change HHH you get a different input.
>>>>>>>> If you want to try to claim the input is just the bytes of the
>>>>>>>> function DDD proper then you are just admitting that you are nothing
>>>>>>>> more than a lying idiot that doesn't understand the problem,
>>>>>>> Turing machines only operate on finite strings they do not operate on
>>>>>>> other Turing machines *dumbo*
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> That's right. But the finite string can be a description of a Turing
>>>>>> machine.
>>>>> No that is wrong. The finite string must encode a Turing machine.
>>>> Same difference.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Not at all. The huge mistake of all these years is that
>>> people stupidly expected that HHH to report on the behavior
>>> of its own executing Turing machine.
>> 
>> No, the error is that HHH report on its own behavour instead of the
>> behaviour specified by its inputs. Nobody expects that your programs
>> do anything interesting or useful.
>> 
> 
> HHH computes the mapping from this finite string: 
> 558bec6863210000e853f4ffff83c4045dc3
> to non-halting behavior because this finite string
> calls HHH(DDD) in recursive simulation.

But it does not compute any interesting mapping. You cannot even specify
the mapping wiohout a reference to HHH.

-- 
Mikko