| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<v7da2l$2ts8o$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mikko <mikko.levanto@iki.fi> Newsgroups: comp.theory Subject: Re: Who here understands that the last paragraph is Necessarily true? Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 12:02:13 +0300 Organization: - Lines: 45 Message-ID: <v7da2l$2ts8o$2@dont-email.me> References: <v6un9t$3nufp$1@dont-email.me> <v7013v$2ccv$1@dont-email.me> <v70nt7$61d8$6@dont-email.me> <58fc6559638120b31e128fe97b5e955248afe218@i2pn2.org> <v71mjh$bp3i$1@dont-email.me> <1173a460ee95e0ca82c08abecdefc80ba86646ac@i2pn2.org> <v71okl$bvm2$1@dont-email.me> <5f6daf68f1b4ffac854d239282bc811b5b806659@i2pn2.org> <v71ttb$crk4$1@dont-email.me> <60e7a93cb8cec0afb68b3e40a0e82e9d63fa8e2a@i2pn2.org> <v725p4$hlvg$2@dont-email.me> <v72n49$kfho$1@dont-email.me> <v739gj$mjis$18@dont-email.me> <v75a9a$16d0i$1@dont-email.me> <v76e04$1cf96$4@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 11:02:13 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d8e6a880333ac9ba3ce5a2356e771ffe"; logging-data="3076376"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Y6pVJeoX+ZMbHtC2IxKvk" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:3sUoZN+893Tog55+mMJs4JrZ1Zg= Bytes: 3146 On 2024-07-16 18:26:12 +0000, olcott said: > On 7/16/2024 3:16 AM, Mikko wrote: >> On 2024-07-15 13:51:14 +0000, olcott said: >> >>> On 7/15/2024 3:37 AM, Mikko wrote: >>>> On 2024-07-15 03:41:24 +0000, olcott said: >>>> >>>>> On 7/14/2024 9:04 PM, Richard Damon wrote: >>>>>> On 7/14/24 9:27 PM, olcott wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any input that must be aborted to prevent the non termination >>>>>>> of simulating termination analyzer HHH necessarily specifies >>>>>>> non-halting behavior or it would never need to be aborted. >>>>>> >>>>>> Excpet, as I have shown, it doesn't. >>>>>> >>>>>> Your problem is you keep on ILEGALLY changing the input in your >>>>>> argument because you have misdefined what the input is. >>>>>> >>>>>> The input to HHH is ALL of the memory that it would be accessed in a >>>>>> correct simulation of DDD, which includes all the codd of HHH, and >>>>>> thus, if you change HHH you get a different input. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you want to try to claim the input is just the bytes of the function >>>>>> DDD proper then you are just admitting that you are nothing more than a >>>>>> lying idiot that doesn't understand the problem, >>>>> Turing machines only operate on finite strings they do >>>>> not operate on other Turing machines *dumbo* >>>> >>>> That's right. But the finite string can be a description of a Turing machine. >>> >>> No that is wrong. The finite string must encode a Turing machine. >> >> That you agree does not mean that it is wrong. >> > > Your ignorance that a Turing machine cannot take its own > executing self as an input is no rebuttal what-so-ever. You should not assume that everyone is as stupid as you. -- Mikko