Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Who here understands that the last paragraph is Necessarily true?
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 09:43:53 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <v7du39$30pvh$8@dont-email.me>
References: <v6un9t$3nufp$1@dont-email.me> <v7013v$2ccv$1@dont-email.me>
 <v70nt7$61d8$6@dont-email.me>
 <58fc6559638120b31e128fe97b5e955248afe218@i2pn2.org>
 <v71mjh$bp3i$1@dont-email.me>
 <1173a460ee95e0ca82c08abecdefc80ba86646ac@i2pn2.org>
 <v71okl$bvm2$1@dont-email.me>
 <5f6daf68f1b4ffac854d239282bc811b5b806659@i2pn2.org>
 <v71ttb$crk4$1@dont-email.me>
 <60e7a93cb8cec0afb68b3e40a0e82e9d63fa8e2a@i2pn2.org>
 <v725p4$hlvg$2@dont-email.me> <v72n49$kfho$1@dont-email.me>
 <v739gj$mjis$18@dont-email.me> <v75a9a$16d0i$1@dont-email.me>
 <v76e04$1cf96$4@dont-email.me> <v7da2l$2ts8o$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 16:43:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="806954090dbe9e2c0be16c7a3e599476";
	logging-data="3172337"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+6Ko6EeeQP6E9DQV6I7OfT"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:/zqixfJZobEA4MUM08x/63ejCQM=
In-Reply-To: <v7da2l$2ts8o$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3715

On 7/19/2024 4:02 AM, Mikko wrote:
> On 2024-07-16 18:26:12 +0000, olcott said:
> 
>> On 7/16/2024 3:16 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>> On 2024-07-15 13:51:14 +0000, olcott said:
>>>
>>>> On 7/15/2024 3:37 AM, Mikko wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-07-15 03:41:24 +0000, olcott said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/14/2024 9:04 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 7/14/24 9:27 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any input that must be aborted to prevent the non termination
>>>>>>>> of simulating termination analyzer HHH necessarily specifies
>>>>>>>> non-halting behavior or it would never need to be aborted.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Excpet, as I have shown, it doesn't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your problem is you keep on ILEGALLY changing the input in your 
>>>>>>> argument because you have misdefined what the input is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The input to HHH is ALL of the memory that it would be accessed 
>>>>>>> in a correct simulation of DDD, which includes all the codd of 
>>>>>>> HHH, and thus, if you change HHH you get a different input.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you want to try to claim the input is just the bytes of the 
>>>>>>> function DDD proper then you are just admitting that you are 
>>>>>>> nothing more than a lying idiot that doesn't understand the problem,
>>>>>> Turing machines only operate on finite strings they do
>>>>>> not operate on other Turing machines *dumbo*
>>>>>
>>>>> That's right. But the finite string can be a description of a 
>>>>> Turing machine.
>>>>
>>>> No that is wrong. The finite string must encode a Turing machine.
>>>
>>> That you agree does not mean that it is wrong.
>>>
>>
>> Your ignorance that a Turing machine cannot take its own
>> executing self as an input is no rebuttal what-so-ever.
> 
> You should not assume that everyone is as stupid as you.
> 

That all rebuttals to my work have one fatal flaw or
another is beyond the comprehension of my reviewers
provides zero evidence that these rebuttals are not flawed.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer