Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Namno <wed3009@yandex.ru>
Newsgroups: comp.infosystems.gemini
Subject: Tables in Gemini
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 16:00:34 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <v7e2j2$31q1g$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 18:00:34 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5943d4b6f63975fe25ff2ff928089f05";
	logging-data="3205168"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19kJJPk3LUTNhrzuWqCfkfrLiRbLW2Ac1+66dyAdwxe1g=="
User-Agent: Pan/0.154 (Izium; 517acf4)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:g9Pl7aqL9uZsX2dDk8bVfLgYGJI=
Bytes: 1276

Greetings. I think that gemtext would benefit from inclusion of tables 
that are not ad-hoc constructs of pseudographics. I have written a blog 
post (gemini://namno.duckdns.org/blog/2024-06-09.gmi) on how I would like 
tables to be implemented in gemini, but I think it would be great if other 
people gave some critique on my reasoning and markup.