Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John McCue <jmccue@hairball.jmcunx.com>
Newsgroups: comp.infosystems.gemini
Subject: Re: Tables in Gemini
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 16:51:49 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <v7e5j4$32b7j$2@dont-email.me>
References: <v7e2j2$31q1g$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: jmclnx@SPAMisBADgmail.com
Injection-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 18:51:49 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="283013b93d036b7056976892f381092f";
	logging-data="3222771"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+rOwxT+SwQ+se7NGnm/voB"
User-Agent: tin/2.6.2-20221225 ("Pittyvaich") (OpenBSD/7.5 (i386))
Cancel-Lock: sha1:XBU3HfdORnUp9d73JmfnpbodXP0=
X-OS-Version: OpenBSD 7.5 i386
Bytes: 1619

Namno <wed3009@yandex.ru> wrote:
> Greetings. I think that gemtext would benefit from inclusion of tables 
> that are not ad-hoc constructs of pseudographics. I have written a blog 
> post (gemini://namno.duckdns.org/blog/2024-06-09.gmi) on how I would like 
> tables to be implemented in gemini, but I think it would be great if other 
> people gave some critique on my reasoning and markup.

I guess it is OK, but my concern is due to the number
of Gemini Clients.  I doubt they would all be updated.

For example, amfora is abandoned, only security
issues will be addressed in amfora.

-- 
csh(1) - "An elegant shell, for a more... civilized age."
                     - Paraphrasing Star Wars